Merck
  • Home
  • Search Results
  • Comparative analysis of two femtosecond LASIK platforms using iTRAQ quantitative proteomics.

Comparative analysis of two femtosecond LASIK platforms using iTRAQ quantitative proteomics.

Investigative ophthalmology & visual science (2014-05-08)
Sharon D'Souza, Andrea Petznick, Louis Tong, Reece C Hall, Mohamad Rosman, Cordelia Chan, Siew Kwan Koh, Roger W Beuerman, Lei Zhou, Jodhbir S Mehta
ABSTRACT

New femtosecond laser platforms may reduce ocular surface interference and LASIK-associated dry eye. This study investigated tear protein profiles in subjects who underwent LASIK using two femtosecond lasers to assess differences in protein expression. This was a randomized interventional clinical trial involving 22 patients who underwent femtosecond laser refractive surgery with a contralateral paired eye design. Corneal flaps of 22 subjects were created by either Visumax or Intralase laser. Tear samples were collected preoperatively, and at 1 week and 3 months postoperatively using Schirmer's strips. Tear protein ratios were calculated relative to preoperative protein levels at baseline. The main outcome measures were the levels of a panel of dry eye protein markers analyzed using isobaric tagging for relative and absolute quantitation (iTRAQ) mass spectrometry. A total of 824 unique proteins were quantifiable. Tear protein ratios were differentially regulated between the eyes treated with different lasers. The secretoglobulins Lipophilin A (1.80-fold) and Lipophilin C (1.77) were significantly upregulated (P < 0.05) at 1 week postoperatively in Visumax but not in Intralase-treated eyes. At 1 week, orosomucoid1 was upregulated (1.78) in Intralase but not Visumax-treated eyes. In the same eyes, lysozyme, cathepsin B, and lipo-oxygenase were downregulated at 0.44-, 0.64-, and 0.64-folds, respectively. Transglutaminase-2 was downregulated in both groups of eyes. Different laser platforms induce distinct biological responses in the cornea and ocular surface, which manifests as different levels of tear proteins. This study has implications for surgical technology and modulation of wound healing responses. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01252654.).

MATERIALS
Product Number
Brand
Product Description

Sigma-Aldrich
S-Methyl methanethiosulfonate, 97%
Sigma-Aldrich
Ammonium bicarbonate, BioUltra, ≥99.5% (T)
Supelco
Dexamethasone, VETRANAL®, analytical standard
Sigma-Aldrich
Dexamethasone, tested according to Ph. Eur.
Sigma-Aldrich
S-Methyl methanethiosulfonate, purum, ≥98.0% (GC)
Sigma-Aldrich
Phosphorus, red, ≥97.0%
Sigma-Aldrich
Dexamethasone, powder, BioReagent, suitable for cell culture, ≥97%
Sigma-Aldrich
Dexamethasone, powder, γ-irradiated, BioXtra, suitable for cell culture, ≥80% (HPLC)
Sigma-Aldrich
β-D-Allose, rare aldohexose sugar
Sigma-Aldrich
Dexamethasone, ≥98% (HPLC), powder
Sigma-Aldrich
Dexamethasone, meets USP testing specifications
Sigma-Aldrich
Phosphorus, red, ≥99.99% trace metals basis
Dexamethasone for system suitability, European Pharmacopoeia (EP) Reference Standard
Dexamethasone, European Pharmacopoeia (EP) Reference Standard
Sigma-Aldrich
Ammonium bicarbonate, ReagentPlus®, ≥99.0%
Dexamethasone, British Pharmacopoeia (BP) Assay Standard
USP
Dexamethasone, United States Pharmacopeia (USP) Reference Standard
Supelco
Dexamethasone, Pharmaceutical Secondary Standard; Certified Reference Material
Supelco
Moxifloxacin hydrochloride, VETRANAL®, analytical standard
Moxifloxacin hydrochloride, European Pharmacopoeia (EP) Reference Standard
Dexamethasone for peak identification, European Pharmacopoeia (EP) Reference Standard