Merck
  • Home
  • Search Results
  • Metal release and metal allergy after total hip replacement with resurfacing versus conventional hybrid prosthesis.

Metal release and metal allergy after total hip replacement with resurfacing versus conventional hybrid prosthesis.

Acta orthopaedica (2014-06-17)
Klas Gustafson, Stig S Jakobsen, Nina D Lorenzen, Jacob P Thyssen, Jeanne D Johansen, Charlotte M Bonefeld, Maiken Stilling, Thomas Baad-Hansen, Kjeld Søballe
ABSTRACT

Metal-on-metal (MOM) total hip arthroplasties were reintroduced because of the problems with osteolysis and aseptic loosening related to polyethylene wear of early metal-on-polyethylene (MOP) arthroplasties. The volumetric wear rate has been greatly reduced with MOM arthroplasties; however, because of nano-size wear particles, the absolute number has been greatly increased. Thus, a source of metal ion exposure with the potential to sensitize patients is present. We hypothesized that higher amounts of wear particles result in increased release of metal ions and ultimately lead to an increased incidence of metal allergy. 52 hips in 52 patients (median age 60 (51-64) years, 30 women) were randomized to either a MOM hip resurfacing system (ReCap) or a standard MOP total hip arthoplasty (Mallory Head/Exeter). Spot urine samples were collected preoperatively, postoperatively, after 3 months, and after 1, 2, and 5 years and tested with inductively coupled plasma-sector field mass spectrometry. After 5 years, hypersensitivity to metals was evaluated by patch testing and lymphocyte transformation assay. In addition, the patients answered a questionnaire about hypersensitivity. A statistically significant 10- to 20-fold increase in urinary levels of cobalt and chromium was observed throughout the entire follow-up in the MOM group. The prevalence of metal allergy was similar between groups. While we observed significantly increased levels of metal ions in the urine during the entire follow-up period, no difference in prevalence of metal allergy was observed in the MOM group. However, the effect of long-term metal exposure remains uncertain.

MATERIALS
Product Number
Brand
Product Description

Sigma-Aldrich
胸苷, powder, BioReagent, suitable for cell culture
Sigma-Aldrich
胸苷, ≥99%
Sigma-Aldrich
聚乙烯, low density, melt index 25 g/10 min (190°C/2.16kg)
Sigma-Aldrich
聚乙烯, average Mw ~4,000 by GPC, average Mn ~1,700 by GPC
Sigma-Aldrich
聚乙烯, Ultra-high molecular weight, surface-modified, powder, 34-50 μm particle size
聚乙烯 (LDPE), ERM®, certified reference material
Sigma-Aldrich
聚乙烯, Ultra-high molecular weight, average Mw 3,000,000-6,000,000
Sigma-Aldrich
钛, foil, thickness 0.127 mm, 99.7% trace metals basis
Sigma-Aldrich
胸苷, ≥99.0% (HPLC)
Sigma-Aldrich
钛, foil, thickness 0.25 mm, 99.7% trace metals basis
Sigma-Aldrich
钛, powder, <45 μm avg. part. size, 99.98% trace metals basis
Sigma-Aldrich
聚乙烯, High density, melt index 12 g/10 min (190 °C/2.16kg)
Sigma-Aldrich
铬, chips, 99.995% trace metals basis
Sigma-Aldrich
钴, powder, <150 μm, ≥99.9% trace metals basis
Sigma-Aldrich
铬, powder, ≥99% trace metals basis, <45 μm
Sigma-Aldrich
钴, powder, 2 μm particle size, 99.8% trace metals basis
Sigma-Aldrich
钛, powder, −100 mesh, 99.7% trace metals basis
Sigma-Aldrich
聚乙烯, High density, melt index 2.2 g/10 min (190 °C/2.16kg)
Sigma-Aldrich
聚乙烯, Ultra-high molecular weight, surface-modified, powder, 125 μm avg. part. size
Sigma-Aldrich
聚乙烯, Medium density
Sigma-Aldrich
聚乙烯, Linear low density, melt index 1.0 g/10 min (190°C/2.16kg)
Sigma-Aldrich
钛, foil, thickness 0.025 mm, 99.98% trace metals basis
Sigma-Aldrich
钛, wire, diam. 0.25 mm, 99.7% trace metals basis
Sigma-Aldrich
铬, powder, 99.5%, −100 mesh
Sigma-Aldrich
钴, Carbon coated magnetic, nanopowder, <50 nm particle size (TEM), ≥99%
Sigma-Aldrich
钴, granular, 99.99% trace metals basis
Sigma-Aldrich
钛, sponge, 3-19 mm, 99.5% trace metals basis
Supelco
聚乙烯, analytical standard, for GPC, 2,000
Sigma-Aldrich
钛, wire, diam. 0.81 mm, 99.7% trace metals basis
Sigma-Aldrich
钛, foil, thickness 2.0 mm, 99.7% trace metals basis