• 主页
  • 查找结果
  • Comparison of marginal fit of Lava CAD/CAM crown-copings with two finish lines.

Comparison of marginal fit of Lava CAD/CAM crown-copings with two finish lines.

The international journal of esthetic dentistry (2014-08-16)
Dino Re, Francesca Cerutti, Gabriele Augusti, Antonio Cerutti, Davide Augusti
摘要

Marginal fit is valued as one of the most important criteria for the clinical quality and success of all-ceramic crowns. The aim of this in vitro study was to investigate the marginal fit of Lava Zirconia crown-copings on chamfer and shoulder preparations. Two acrylic model teeth were selected to simulate the clinical preparations: one molar was prepared with a chamfer finish line (C) and one premolar was prepared with a rounded shoulder finish line (RS). Each resin model was duplicated 10 times using silicon-based impression material and poured in type IV dental stone for the fabrication of working dies. A total of 20 copings were divided into two groups (n = 10 for each finish line). Fifty measuring locations were chosen randomly along the margin on the dies and the gap width - vertical marginal discrepancy - was measured under a light microscope with a magnification of x100. Measurements were made without cementation. The mean marginal gap widths and standard deviations were calculated and a one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was performed for different types of preparations in order to detect differences (α = 0.05). The mean marginal gap was 30 ± 3 μm for the C group and 28 ± 4 μm for the RS group. The one-way ANOVA showed no statistical significant difference between the two groups (P = 0.23). Within the limitations of this study, the marginal discrepancies were all within the clinical acceptable standard set at 120 μm. Chamfer and shoulder preparations did not show differences regarding the gap dimension. Bur design is an easily selected parameter before natural tooth preparation. Both tested finish lines are able to help clinicians in obtaining acceptable marginal fit values for the investigated zirconia copings.

材料
货号
品牌
产品描述

Sigma-Aldrich
氧化锆 (IV), powder, 5 μm, 99% trace metals basis
Sigma-Aldrich
氧化锆 (IV), nanopowder, <100 nm particle size (TEM)
Sigma-Aldrich
锆, powder, −100 mesh
Sigma-Aldrich
锆, foil, thickness 0.1 mm, 99.98% trace metals basis
Sigma-Aldrich
氧化锆 (IV), 99.99% trace metals basis (purity excludes ~2% HfO2)
Sigma-Aldrich
氧化锆(IV), nanoparticles, dispersion, <100 nm particle size (BET), 5 wt. % in H2O
Sigma-Aldrich
锆, sponge, ≥99% trace metals basis
Sigma-Aldrich
锆, rod, diam. 6.35 mm, ≥99% trace metals basis
Sigma-Aldrich
氧化锆(IV), nanoparticles, dispersion, <100 nm particle size (BET), 10 wt. % in H2O
锆, rod, 100mm, diameter 50mm, centerless ground, 99.2%
Sigma-Aldrich
锆, powder, in water, -325 mesh, 99.5% trace metals basis (excluding Hf)
锆, foil, not light tested, 50x50mm, thickness 0.006mm, 99.2%
锆, rod, 1000mm, diameter 1.5mm, 99.2%
锆, rod, 1000mm, diameter 12.7mm, centerless ground, 99.2%
锆, rod, 1000mm, diameter 2.0mm, centerless ground, 99.2%
锆, rod, 1000mm, diameter 3.0mm, centerless ground, 99.2%
锆, rod, 1000mm, diameter 5.0mm, centerless ground, 99.2%
锆, rod, 1000mm, diameter 6.0mm, centerless ground, 99.2%
锆, rod, 1000mm, diameter 9.5mm, centerless ground, 99.2%
锆, rod, 100mm, diameter 1.5mm, 99.2%
锆, rod, 100mm, diameter 12.7mm, centerless ground, 99.2%
锆, rod, 100mm, diameter 19.0mm, centerless ground, 99.2%
锆, rod, 100mm, diameter 2.0mm, centerless ground, 99.2%
锆, rod, 100mm, diameter 3.0mm, centerless ground, 99.2%
锆, rod, 100mm, diameter 5.0mm, centerless ground, 99.2%
锆, rod, 100mm, diameter 6.0mm, centerless ground, 99.2%
锆, rod, 100mm, diameter 9.5mm, centerless ground, 99.2%
锆, rod, 200mm, diameter 1.5mm, 99.2%
锆, rod, 200mm, diameter 12.7mm, centerless ground, 99.2%
锆, rod, 200mm, diameter 19.0mm, centerless ground, 99.2%

社交媒体

LinkedIn icon
Twitter icon
Facebook Icon
Instagram Icon

Merck

科研、开发、生产。

作为生命科学行业的全球领先供应商,我们致力于为科研、生物技术开发和生产,以及制药药物疗法开发和生产提供各类解决方案和服务。

© 2021年版权归德国达姆施塔特默克集团(Merck KGaA)及/或其附属公司所有。版权所有。

未经许可,严禁复制本网站上的任何资料。