Skip to Content
Merck
  • Effect of selected Saccharomyces cerevisiae yeast strains and different aging techniques on the polysaccharide and polyphenolic composition and sensorial characteristics of Cabernet Sauvignon red wines.

Effect of selected Saccharomyces cerevisiae yeast strains and different aging techniques on the polysaccharide and polyphenolic composition and sensorial characteristics of Cabernet Sauvignon red wines.

Journal of the science of food and agriculture (2014-09-27)
Rubén del Barrio-Galán, Alejandro Cáceres-Mella, Marcela Medel-Marabolí, Álvaro Peña-Neira
ABSTRACT

The objective of this work was to study the effect of two Saccharomyces cerevisiae yeast strains with different capabilities of polysaccharide liberation during alcoholic fermentation in addition to subsequent aging on lees with or without oak wood chips as well as aging with commercial inactive dry yeast on the physical, chemical and sensorial characteristics of Cabernet Sauvignon red wines. The HPS (high levels of polysaccharides) yeast strain released higher amounts of polysaccharides (429 g L(-1)) than EC1118 (390 g L(-1)) during alcoholic fermentation, but the concentration equalized during the aging period (424 and 417 g L(-1) respectively). All aging techniques increased the polysaccharide concentration, but the increase was dependent on the technique applied. A higher liberation of polysaccharides reduced the concentration of most of the phenolic families analyzed. Moreover, no clear effect of the different aging techniques used in this study on color stabilization was found. The HPS wines were better valued than the EC1118 wines by the panel of tasters after alcoholic fermentation. In general, the HPS wines showed better physicochemical and sensorial characteristics than the EC1118 wines. According to the results obtained during the aging period, all aging techniques contributed to improve wine quality, but it was difficult to establish the technique that allowed the best wine to be obtained, because it depended on the aging technique used and the period of aging.

MATERIALS
Product Number
Brand
Product Description

Sigma-Aldrich
Formic acid, ≥95%, FCC, FG
Sigma-Aldrich
trans-Ferulic acid, 99%
Sigma-Aldrich
Ammonium formate solution, BioUltra, 10 M in H2O
Sigma-Aldrich
Sodium hydroxide-16O solution, 20 wt. % in H216O, 99.9 atom % 16O
Sigma-Aldrich
Ethyl acetate, natural, ≥99%, FCC, FG
Sigma-Aldrich
trans-Ferulic acid, ≥99%
Sigma-Aldrich
Ethyl acetate, ≥99%, FCC, FG
Sigma-Aldrich
Ethanol, absolute, sales not in Germany, ≥99.8% (vol.)
Sigma-Aldrich
Acetonitrile, anhydrous, 99.8%
Sigma-Aldrich
Acetaldehyde, ACS reagent, ≥99.5%
Sigma-Aldrich
Ethyl acetate, ReagentPlus®, ≥99.8%
Sigma-Aldrich
L-Lysine monohydrochloride, BioUltra, ≥99.5% (AT)
Sigma-Aldrich
3,4-Dihydroxybenzoic acid, ≥97.0% (T)
Sigma-Aldrich
Myricetin, ≥96.0% (HPLC)
Sigma-Aldrich
5α-Androstan-17β-ol-3-one, purum, ≥99.0% (TLC)
Sigma-Aldrich
L-Lysine monohydrochloride, reagent grade, ≥98% (HPLC)
Sigma-Aldrich
L-Lysine monohydrochloride, from non-animal source, meets EP, JP, USP testing specifications, suitable for cell culture, 98.5-101.0%
Sigma-Aldrich
Gallic acid, 97.5-102.5% (titration)
Sigma-Aldrich
Myricetin, ≥96.0%, crystalline
Sigma-Aldrich
Caffeic acid, ≥98.0% (HPLC)
Sigma-Aldrich
Syringic acid, ≥95% (HPLC)
Sigma-Aldrich
5α-Androstan-17β-ol-3-one, ≥97.5%
Sigma-Aldrich
Acetaldehyde, natural, FG
Sigma-Aldrich
Ethyl acetate
Sigma-Aldrich
Ultrapure Acetonitrile
Sigma-Aldrich
Ethyl acetate
Sigma-Aldrich
Ethyl alcohol, Pure, 160 proof, Excise Tax-free, Permit for use required
Sigma-Aldrich
Acetonitrile, electronic grade, 99.999% trace metals basis
Sigma-Aldrich
Hydrogen chloride solution, 3 M in cyclopentyl methyl ether (CPME)
Sigma-Aldrich
Methanol, suitable for NMR (reference standard)