Skip to Content
Merck
  • Importance of a suitable working protocol for tape stripping experiments on porcine ear skin: Influence of lipophilic formulations and strip adhesion impairment.

Importance of a suitable working protocol for tape stripping experiments on porcine ear skin: Influence of lipophilic formulations and strip adhesion impairment.

International journal of pharmaceutics (2015-06-29)
C Nagelreiter, D Mahrhauser, K Wiatschka, S Skipiol, C Valenta
ABSTRACT

The tape stripping method is a very important tool for dermopharmacokinetic experiments in vitro and the accurate measurement of the removed corneocytes is key for a reliable calculation of a drug's skin penetration behavior. Therefore, various methods to quantify the amount of corneocytes removed with each tape strip have been employed, ranging from gravimetric approaches to protein assays and recently near infrared densitometry (NIR) has become very widely used. As this method is based on a reduction of light intensity, interference of formulation components seems conceivable, as they could scatter light and change the results. In this study, NIR measurements were compared to a protein assay and in addition, the influence of highly lipophilic formulations on the results of tape stripping experiments was investigated as impairment of the adherence of strips has been reported. To this end, different tape stripping protocols were employed. The obtained results ensure suitability of the NIR method and moreover suggest a more pronounced influence on adherence with increasing lipophilicity in applied formulations. The results show that adaptation of the tape stripping protocol to the specifications of envisioned experiments is important for reliable results. Two protocols were found favorable and are presented in this work.

MATERIALS
Product Number
Brand
Product Description

Sigma-Aldrich
Sodium hydroxide, ultra dry, powder or crystals, 99.99% trace metals basis
Sigma-Aldrich
Sodium hydroxide solution, 20 % (w/v)
Sigma-Aldrich
Hydrochloric acid solution, 0.01 M
Sigma-Aldrich
Hydrochloric acid solution, 0.5 M
Sigma-Aldrich
Sodium hydroxide solution, 0.02 M
Sigma-Aldrich
Hydrochloric acid solution, 2 M
Sigma-Aldrich
Hydrochloric acid, SAJ first grade, 35.0-37.0%
Sigma-Aldrich
Hydrochloric acid, suitable for arsenic determination, 35.0-37.0%
Sigma-Aldrich
Sodium hydroxide solution, 0.05 M
Sigma-Aldrich
Hydrochloric acid solution, 6 M
Sigma-Aldrich
Sodium hydroxide solution, 7 M
Sigma-Aldrich
Chloroform, SAJ super special grade, ≥99.0%
Sigma-Aldrich
Hydrochloric acid, suitable for determination of toxic metals, ≥35.0%
Sigma-Aldrich
Hydrochloric acid solution, 0.1 M
Sigma-Aldrich
Sodium hydroxide solution, 6 M
Sigma-Aldrich
Chloroform, SAJ first grade, ≥99.0%, contains 0.4-0.8% ethanol
Sigma-Aldrich
Sodium hydroxide solution, 2 M
Sigma-Aldrich
Hydrochloric acid solution, 0.05 M
Sigma-Aldrich
Hydrogen chloride – ethanol solution, 3% in ethanol
Sigma-Aldrich
Chloroform, JIS special grade, ≥99.0%
Sigma-Aldrich
Sodium hydroxide solution, 1 M
Sigma-Aldrich
Hydrochloric acid solution, 0.2 M
Sigma-Aldrich
Chloroform, JIS 300, ≥99.0%
Sigma-Aldrich
Hydrochloric acid solution, 0.02 M
Sigma-Aldrich
Sodium hydroxide solution, 0.01 M
Sigma-Aldrich
Hydrochloric acid solution, 1 M
Sigma-Aldrich
Hydrochloric acid solution, SAJ first grade, 9.5-10.0%
Sigma-Aldrich
Sodium hydroxide solution, 0.1 M
Sigma-Aldrich
Sodium hydroxide, ≥96.0%
Sigma-Aldrich
Sodium hydroxide solution, 4 M