Dynamic Nuclear Polarization

Dr. Matthew E. Merritt

Advanced Imaging Research Center Southwestern Medical Center at Dallas

Dynamic Nuclear Polarization (DNP) is a phenomenon by which high spin polarization, typically derived from a bath of free radical electrons, is transferred to a nuclear spin bath, enhancing the difference between the nuclear energy levels and thereby producing dramatically enhanced NMR signals for detection. The phenomenon was fi rst predicted by Overhauser,1 but was not observed experimentally until the work of Slichter in metals in 1953.2 It was soon understood that the same technique could be used to develop high polarizations of 1H, 2H, and 13C in non-conducting solids. This advance became foundational for production of solid targets for high energy physics research.3–5 High nuclear polarizations in the targets simplifi ed the results of neutron scattering experiments. Subsequently, the DNP method migrated to chemistry, being used to study a variety of structural questions in the solid state.6,7 Robert Griffi n of MIT has pioneered the use of DNP for signal enhancement in solid state NMR distance measurements for structural biology.8 In his method, a water soluble free radical is doped into a matrix containing H2O/glycerol and the solute molecule/protein to be studied. This method has recently been used to study the K intermediate of bacteriorhodopsin in intact purple membrane.9 While DNP is also possible in the liquid state, it is much less effi cient due to the diminishment of the intermolecular dipolar couplings by fast molecular tumbling.10

The production of hyperpolarized molecular imaging agents has sparked great enthusiasm in the MRI community due to its potential application as a clinically viable method for assessing in vivo metabolism. Golman and co-workers demonstrated that a hyperpolarized solid may be rapidly melted with a bolus of boiling water and shuttled out of the DNP system using high pressure helium gas.11 The hyperpolarized solute molecule can be used as an imaging agent12–14. The most popular molecule to date for hyperpolarization studies has been [1-13C]pyruvate, though other common metabolites have also been used successfully. This technique now stands as one of the most promising new methods for measuring in vivo metabolism.

Energy level diagram for a coupled electron-nuclear spin system

Figure 1. Energy level diagram for a coupled electron-nuclear spin system. The normally forbidden transitions (colored arrows) can be excited by microwave irradiation, resulting in dramatically increased nuclear polarizations.

Dynamic Nuclear Polarization

The DNP phenomenon was fi rst recognized as theoretically possible as an outfl ow of basic research into the nature of cross relaxation in NMR. Figure 1 shows the energy level diagram for a single electron coupled to a nuclear spin in a strong magnetic field. The gyromagnetic ratio for an electron spin is ~2400 times greater than that of a 13C nucleus. Therefore the single quantum transitions associated with the electrons are in the gigahertz regime (94 GHz at 3.35T) while the carbon Larmor frequency is ~35 MHz. Normally, zero (Figure 1 red arrow) or double quantum transitions (Figure 1 green arrow) are strictly forbidden. However, the hyperfine coupling between the spins is of suffi cient magnitude that the 4 energy levels are not pure states, and consequently these transitions become partially allowed. Under microwave irradiation at the electron resonance frequency ± the nuclear frequency these transitions are stimulated and the nuclear polarization is enhanced in a positive or negative manner depending on the transition that is irradiated (Figure 2). This is known in the literature as the solid effect. This mechanism is active when the electron resonance has a linewidth of the same order or less than the nuclear Larmor frequency. This is commonly the case when the trityl radical is used for polarizing protons. However, at 3.35T the FWHM of the electron resonance is ~44 MHz.15 Therefore, when using trityl and 13C, the thermal mixing mechanism is likely the main source of polarization. Thermal mixing is another DNP mechanism that is active when the electron resonance is wider than the nuclear Larmor frequency, as is common when nitroxide radicals such as TEMPO are used or when lower γ nuclei are the targets. An excellent description of the differences between the two mechanisms is outlined in the paper by Comment, et. al.16 In a somewhat simplifi ed picture, thermal mixing is a three spin effect as opposed to two in the solid effect. It also depends upon strong dipolar couplings between electron spins, in effect, the presence of an electron spin bath that can be described with a single temperature. Irradiation of the bath at a certain frequency causes other coupled electron spins to flip. Since the spins at other resonance frequencies have slightly different energies, the difference can be made up with a coupled nuclear spin. Since a difference in frequencies is still necessary like in the solid effect, thermal mixing again produces characteristic positive and negative enhancements, though the maxima are separated by a number closer to the Larmor frequency of the nucleus (Figure 2). Traditionally, it has been understood that the solid effect required more power than thermal mixing since forbidden transitions are pumped. In thermal mixing, no forbidden transitions are present and therefore it might be expected to be a more effi cient mechanism. This likely explains the extremely high polarizations achievable when using trityl and 13C. New bi-radicals seek to increase the available polarization by tethering the free electrons together, resulting in stronger electron dipolar couplings and enhancing thermal mixing for protons.17

DNP enhancement curve as a function of frequency

Figure 2. DNP enhancement curve as a function of frequency for [1-13C]pyruvate mixed with the trityl radical. Each data point was collected after irradiation for 300 seconds, which is not long enough to reach the equilibrium polarization. The 70 MHz splitting observed would lead one to believe that the solid effect is active, but longer irradiation times show a splitting between the maxima of ~63 MHz, indicating thermal mixing as the source of enhancement.

Fast Dissolution DNP

The DNP method developed by Golman and co-workers has several essential elements that allow the spectacular signal enhancements seen to date.11 First, the experiment is carried out at 1.2 to 1.4 K. At room temperature, the enhancement from DNP goes as the ratio of the gyromagnetic ratios of the dipolar coupled spins. At these very low temperatures, the Boltzmann distribution begins to display exponential behavior; at 1.4 K the electrons are ~92% polarized as opposed to less than 1% for 1H and 13C. Consequently, DNP at low temperatures can produce nuclear polarizations in the percent range as well, which is far greater than the enhancement available at room temperature. The second, key insight was the realization that the sample could be melted on a time scale fast enough that large polarizations were left over after the dissolution. The developed polarization decays with the normal T1 of the nucleus. If the melting is slow, suffi cient sensitivity is not retained in the experiment. Typically, melting of a 40 to 200 μL DNP sample is accomplished with 3 mL–6 mL of water at ~190 °C and 10 bar of pressure supplied by a compressed helium tank. Due to the constraints imposed by the decay of the magnetization, protonated carbons are typically more diffi cult to use for DNP. C-1 labeled pyruvate has been a metabolite of choice since the C-3 protons are distal from the observed carbon. Hence, the primary source of relaxation arises from the chemical shift anisotropy. The T1 of the C-1 carbon of pyruvate is close to 1 minute at 1.5 Tesla and ~40 seconds at 14.1 T.

Metabolism using Hyperpolarization Technique

Carbon-13 NMR spectrum of a perfused mouse heart following injection

Figure 3. Carbon-13 NMR spectrum of a perfused mouse heart following injection of 2 mM hyperpolarized [1-13C]pyruvate. The spectrum is a sum of 70 scans. All metabolites generated from the pyruvate are also 13C labeled.

The central feature that makes imaging or spectroscopy using hyperpolarized 13C labeled compounds so appealing is the incredible gains in signal to noise that can be achieved, allowing observation of biochemical reactions in vivo and in vitro that previously could not be monitored with any technique (Figure 3). The most common example, hyperpolarized [1–13C]pyruvate illustrates the high information content of MR combined with hyperpolarization in powerful fashion. Figure 4 shows the information available by three different methods for assessing metabolism. Assume that three different samples have been prepared, a 11C labeled pyruvate, [3-13C]pyruvate, and hyperpolarized [1-13C]pyruvate, for injection into a commonly used model of metabolism, the perfused rat heart. Observation of the 11C compound by positron emission tomography (PET) will reveal only the uptake of the pyruvate, producing the familiar dose-response curve (Figure 4, A). Observation of the delivery of the [3-13C]pyruvate by NMR would allow not only the uptake of the pyruvate to be monitored, but also its subsequent metabolism to lactate and alanine. It has been shown that detection of the label using indirect methods such as heteronuclear multiple quantum coherence (HMQC) can allow time points to be taken approximately every 10–20 seconds (Figure 4, B).18 The bottom panel shows the data that would be obtained following injection of the hyperpolarized substrate (Figure 4, C). Due to the increase in signal to noise, time points can be taken every second, or even faster. Also, since direct detection of the 13C label is possible, flux into CO2 and bicarbonate is detectable as well. In this lab, the signal to noise gain for the hyperpolarization experiment versus the HMQC method is approximately 50 times, with the bonus of much higher resolution as a function of time following the injection. The power of this technique has already been taken advantage of to study a variety of questions with physiological and pathological signifi cance. Hyperpolarized H13CO3 – has been used as a means of assessing pH by monitoring the equilibrium between CO2 and bicarbonate.19 This method of pH measurement has the unique advantage of injecting a completely benign compound as the sensor. Hyperpolarized [1-13C]pyruvate has been used to measure substrate preference in a perfused heart model, demonstrating the ability to assess fl ux through a single enzyme catalyzed reaction.20 Workers at Cambridge University and UCSF have already shown that the kinetics of dispersal of hyperpolarized pyruvate is sensitive to cancer in vivo.21–23 Cardiac dysfunction following myocardial infarction could also potentially be detected with this method.24,25

Observed pyruvate signal

Figure 4. Observed pyruvate signal: A) PET, 11C-pyruvate ; B) 13C-NMR, [3-13C] pyruvate; C) 13C-MR, hyperpolarized [1-13C] pyruvate

Conclusion

In summary, hyperpolarization of 13C compounds is an extremely promising new avenue for molecular imaging and metabolism studies. Applications to cancer and cardiac metabolism are currently under development. Clinically relevant measures of metabolism with this technique should become available during the next decade.

Materials
Loading

References

1.
Overhauser AW. Polarization of Nuclei in Metals. Phys. Rev.. 92(2):411-415. http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/physrev.92.411
2.
Carver TR, Slichter CP. Polarization of Nuclear Spins in Metals. Phys. Rev.. 92(1):212-213. http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/physrev.92.212.2
3.
Abragam A, Goldman M, Redfield AG. 1982. Nuclear Magnetism: Order and Disorder. Physics Today. 35(12):61-63. http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.2914893
4.
de Boer W. 1976. Dynamic orientation of nuclei at low temperatures. J Low Temp Phys. 22(1-2):185-212. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/bf00655221
5.
de Boer W, Borghini M, Morimoto K, Niinikoski TO, Udo F. 1974. Dynamic polarization of protons, deuterons, and carbon-13 nuclei: Thermal contact between nuclear spins and an electron spin-spin interaction reservoir. J Low Temp Phys. 15(3-4):249-267. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/bf00661185
6.
Afeworki M, McKay RA, Schaefer J. 1992. Selective observation of the interface of heterogeneous polycarbonate/polystyrene blends by dynamic nuclear polarization carbon-13 NMR spectroscopy. Macromolecules. 25(16):4084-4091. http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/ma00042a006
7.
Wind R, Duijvestijn M, van der Lugt C, Manenschijn A, Vriend J. 1985. Applications of dynamic nuclear polarization in 13C NMR in solids. Progress in Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy. 1733-67. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0079-6565(85)80005-4
8.
Gerfen GJ, Becerra LR, Hall DA, Griffin RG, Temkin RJ, Singel DJ. 1995. High frequency (140 GHz) dynamic nuclear polarization: Polarization transfer to a solute in frozen aqueous solution. The Journal of Chemical Physics. 102(24):9494-9497. http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.468818
9.
Mak-Jurkauskas ML, Bajaj VS, Hornstein MK, Belenky M, Griffin RG, Herzfeld J. 2008. Energy transformations early in the bacteriorhodopsin photocycle revealed by DNP-enhanced solid-state NMR. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 105(3):883-888. http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0706156105
10.
Loening NM, Rosay M, Weis V, Griffin RG. 2002. Solution-State Dynamic Nuclear Polarization at High Magnetic Field. J. Am. Chem. Soc.. 124(30):8808-8809. http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/ja026660g
11.
Ardenkjaer-Larsen JH, Fridlund B, Gram A, Hansson G, Hansson L, Lerche MH, Servin R, Thaning M, Golman K. 2003. Increase in signal-to-noise ratio of > 10,000 times in liquid-state NMR. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 100(18):10158-10163. http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1733835100
12.
Golman K, Zandt Ri, Lerche M, Pehrson R, Ardenkjaer-Larsen JH. 2006. Metabolic Imaging by Hyperpolarized 13C Magnetic Resonance Imaging for In vivo Tumor Diagnosis. Cancer Research. 66(22):10855-10860. http://dx.doi.org/10.1158/0008-5472.can-06-2564
13.
Golman K, in 't Zandt R, Thaning M. 2006. Real-time metabolic imaging. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 103(30):11270-11275. http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0601319103
14.
Golman K, Petersson JS. 2006. Metabolic Imaging and Other Applications of Hyperpolarized 13C1. Academic Radiology. 13(8):932-942. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.acra.2006.06.001
15.
Wolber J, Ellner F, Fridlund B, Gram A, Jóhannesson H, Hansson G, Hansson L, Lerche M, Månsson S, Servin R, et al. 2004. Generating highly polarized nuclear spins in solution using dynamic nuclear polarization. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A: Accelerators, Spectrometers, Detectors and Associated Equipment. 526(1-2):173-181. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nima.2004.03.171
16.
Comment A, van den Brandt B, Uffmann K, Kurdzesau F, Jannin S, Konter J, Hautle P, Wenckebach W, Gruetter R, van der Klink J. 2007. Design and performance of a DNP prepolarizer coupled to a rodent MRI scanner. Concepts Magn. Reson.. 31B(4):255-269. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cmr.b.20099
17.
Hu K, Yu H, Swager TM, Griffin RG. 2004. Dynamic Nuclear Polarization with Biradicals. J. Am. Chem. Soc.. 126(35):10844-10845. http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/ja039749a
18.
Burgess SC, Babcock EE, Jeffrey FH, Sherry A, Malloy CR. 2001. NMR indirect detection of glutamate to measure citric acid cycle flux in the isolated perfused mouse heart. 505(1):163-167. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0014-5793(01)02799-5
19.
Gallagher FA, Kettunen MI, Day SE, Hu D, Ardenkjær-Larsen JH, Zandt Ri?, Jensen PR, Karlsson M, Golman K, Lerche MH, et al. 2008. Magnetic resonance imaging of pH in vivo using hyperpolarized 13C-labelled bicarbonate. Nature. 453(7197):940-943. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature07017
20.
Merritt ME, Harrison C, Storey C, Jeffrey FM, Sherry AD, Malloy CR. 2007. Hyperpolarized 13C allows a direct measure of flux through a single enzyme-catalyzed step by NMR. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 104(50):19773-19777. http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0706235104
21.
Albers MJ, Bok R, Chen AP, Cunningham CH, Zierhut ML, Zhang VY, Kohler SJ, Tropp J, Hurd RE, Yen Y, et al. 2008. Hyperpolarized 13C Lactate, Pyruvate, and Alanine: Noninvasive Biomarkers for Prostate Cancer Detection and Grading. Cancer Research. 68(20):8607-8615. http://dx.doi.org/10.1158/0008-5472.can-08-0749
22.
Chen AP, Albers MJ, Cunningham CH, Kohler SJ, Yen Y, Hurd RE, Tropp J, Bok R, Pauly JM, Nelson SJ, et al. 2007. Hyperpolarized C-13 spectroscopic imaging of the TRAMP mouse at 3T?Initial experience. Magn. Reson. Med.. 58(6):1099-1106. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mrm.21256
23.
Day SE, Kettunen MI, Gallagher FA, Hu D, Lerche M, Wolber J, Golman K, Ardenkjaer-Larsen JH, Brindle KM. 2007. Detecting tumor response to treatment using hyperpolarized 13C magnetic resonance imaging and spectroscopy. Nat Med. 13(11):1382-1387. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nm1650
24.
Golman K, Petersson JS, Magnusson P, Johansson E, Åkeson P, Chai C, Hansson G, Månsson S. 2008. Cardiac metabolism measured noninvasively by hyperpolarized13C MRI. Magn. Reson. Med.. 59(5):1005-1013. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mrm.21460
25.
Merritt ME, Harrison C, Storey C, Sherry AD, Malloy CR. 2008. Inhibition of carbohydrate oxidation during the first minute of reperfusion after brief ischemia: NMR detection of hyperpolarized13CO2and H13CO3?. Magn. Reson. Med.. 60(5):1029-1036. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mrm.21760