Skip to Content
Merck
  • Effect of different aging techniques on the polysaccharide and phenolic composition and sensory characteristics of Syrah red wines fermented using different yeast strains.

Effect of different aging techniques on the polysaccharide and phenolic composition and sensory characteristics of Syrah red wines fermented using different yeast strains.

Food chemistry (2015-02-28)
Rubén del Barrio-Galán, Marcela Medel-Marabolí, Álvaro Peña-Neira
ABSTRACT

The effect of high levels of the polysaccharide Saccharomyces cerevisiae yeast strain (HPS) and another conventional yeast strain (FERM) on the polysaccharide and phenolic composition of Syrah red wines during alcoholic fermentation and subsequent aging on lees, with or without oak wood chips, and on inactive dry yeast was investigated. The HPS yeast released higher amounts of polysaccharides during alcoholic fermentation than FERM yeast (485 g L(-1) and 403 g L(-1), respectively) and after the aging period (516 g L(-1) and 500 g L(-1), respectively). The different aging techniques increased the polysaccharide concentration; the concentration was dependent on the aging technique applied. The interaction of the polysaccharides with the phenolic compounds depended on the yeast strain, aging technique, aging period and compound analysed. The HPS wines exhibited better sensory characteristics than the FERM wines after alcoholic fermentation; however, during the aging period, it was difficult to determine which technique produced the best wine due to the interactions of aging technique, aging period and sensory attribute evaluated.

MATERIALS
Product Number
Brand
Product Description

Sigma-Aldrich
Acetic acid-12C2, 99.9 atom % 12C
Supelco
Ethanol solution, certified reference material, 2000 μg/mL in methanol
Sigma-Aldrich
Acetaldehyde solution, 5 M in THF
Sigma-Aldrich
Acetaldehyde solution, 40 wt. % in isopropanol
Sigma-Aldrich
Ammonium formate, ≥99.995% trace metals basis
Sigma-Aldrich
Acetic acid, ≥99.5%, FCC, FG
Sigma-Aldrich
Acetic acid, natural, ≥99.5%, FG
Sigma-Aldrich
Acetaldehyde solution, 50 wt. % in ethanol
Sigma-Aldrich
Acetic acid, suitable for luminescence, BioUltra, ≥99.5% (GC)
Supelco
Ammonium formate, eluent additive for LC-MS, LiChropur, ≥99.0%
Sigma-Aldrich
Ammonium formate, BioUltra, ≥99.0% (calc. based on dry substance, NT)
Supelco
Acetic acid, analytical standard
Supelco
Hydrogen chloride – ethanol, ~1.25 M HCl, derivatization grade (GC derivatization), LiChropur
Supelco
Hydrogen chloride – methanol solution, ~1.25 m HCl (T), derivatization grade (GC derivatization), LiChropur
Sigma-Aldrich
3-Ethyl-2,4-pentanedione, mixture of tautomers, 98%
Supelco
Hydrogen chloride – 2-propanol solution, ~1.25 M HCl (T), derivatization grade (GC derivatization), LiChropur
Sigma-Aldrich
Acetic acid, glacial, puriss., 99-100%
Sigma-Aldrich
Acetaldehyde solution, 40 wt. % in H2O
Supelco
Quercetin, Pharmaceutical Secondary Standard; Certified Reference Material
Sigma-Aldrich
Acetic acid, glacial, ACS reagent, ≥99.7%
Sigma-Aldrich
Ammonium formate, reagent grade, 97%
Sigma-Aldrich
Sulfuric acid solution, puriss. p.a., ≥25% (T)
Sigma-Aldrich
Acetic acid, glacial, ReagentPlus®, ≥99%
USP
Quercetin, United States Pharmacopeia (USP) Reference Standard
Lysine hydrochloride, European Pharmacopoeia (EP) Reference Standard
Sigma-Aldrich
Hydrogen chloride solution, 3 M in cyclopentyl methyl ether (CPME)
Sigma-Aldrich
Hydrogen chloride solution, 2.0 M in diethyl ether
Sigma-Aldrich
Acetic acid, glacial, ≥99.99% trace metals basis
Sigma-Aldrich
Acetic acid, glacial, puriss., meets analytical specification of Ph. Eur., BP, USP, 99.8-100.5%
Sigma-Aldrich
Hydrogen chloride solution, 1.0 M in acetic acid