Skip to Content
Merck
  • Effect of different aging techniques on the polysaccharide and phenolic composition and sensory characteristics of Syrah red wines fermented using different yeast strains.

Effect of different aging techniques on the polysaccharide and phenolic composition and sensory characteristics of Syrah red wines fermented using different yeast strains.

Food chemistry (2015-02-28)
Rubén del Barrio-Galán, Marcela Medel-Marabolí, Álvaro Peña-Neira
ABSTRACT

The effect of high levels of the polysaccharide Saccharomyces cerevisiae yeast strain (HPS) and another conventional yeast strain (FERM) on the polysaccharide and phenolic composition of Syrah red wines during alcoholic fermentation and subsequent aging on lees, with or without oak wood chips, and on inactive dry yeast was investigated. The HPS yeast released higher amounts of polysaccharides during alcoholic fermentation than FERM yeast (485 g L(-1) and 403 g L(-1), respectively) and after the aging period (516 g L(-1) and 500 g L(-1), respectively). The different aging techniques increased the polysaccharide concentration; the concentration was dependent on the aging technique applied. The interaction of the polysaccharides with the phenolic compounds depended on the yeast strain, aging technique, aging period and compound analysed. The HPS wines exhibited better sensory characteristics than the FERM wines after alcoholic fermentation; however, during the aging period, it was difficult to determine which technique produced the best wine due to the interactions of aging technique, aging period and sensory attribute evaluated.

MATERIALS
Product Number
Brand
Product Description

Sigma-Aldrich
Acetic acid-12C2, 99.9 atom % 12C
Sigma-Aldrich
Acetaldehyde solution, 40 wt. % in H2O
Lysine hydrochloride, European Pharmacopoeia (EP) Reference Standard
Supelco
Acetonitrile(Neat), Pharmaceutical Secondary Standard; Certified Reference Material
Sigma-Aldrich
Sodium hydroxide, ultra dry, powder or crystals, 99.99% trace metals basis
Sigma-Aldrich
Ammonium formate, BioUltra, ≥99.0% (calc. based on dry substance, NT)
Supelco
Hydrogen chloride – methanol solution, ~1.25 m HCl (T), derivatization grade (GC derivatization), LiChropur
Supelco
Hydrogen chloride – 2-propanol solution, ~1.25 M HCl (T), derivatization grade (GC derivatization), LiChropur
Sigma-Aldrich
Hydrochloric acid solution, ~6 M in H2O, for amino acid analysis
Supelco
Sulfuric acid, for the determination of nitrogen, ≥97.0%
Supelco
Sodium hydroxide solution, 49-51% in water, eluent for IC
Sigma-Aldrich
Sodium hydroxide solution, BioUltra, Molecular Biology, 10 M in H2O
Sigma-Aldrich
Acetic acid, natural, ≥99.5%, FG
Sigma-Aldrich
Acetaldehyde solution, 40 wt. % in isopropanol
Sigma-Aldrich
2-(4-Hydroxyphenyl)ethanol, 98%
Sigma-Aldrich
Acetic acid, ≥99.5%, FCC, FG
Sigma-Aldrich
Diethyl ether
Sigma-Aldrich
Acetaldehyde solution, natural, 50 wt. % ethanol, FG
Sigma-Aldrich
Acetaldehyde solution, 50 wt. % in ethanol
Sigma-Aldrich
Sodium sulfate, BioUltra, anhydrous, ≥99.0% (T)
Sigma-Aldrich
sulfur powder, 99.998% trace metals basis
Sigma-Aldrich
Ammonium formate, ≥99.995% trace metals basis
Sigma-Aldrich
Acetic acid, suitable for luminescence, BioUltra, ≥99.5% (GC)
Sigma-Aldrich
Sulfuric acid, 99.999%
Sigma-Aldrich
Hydrochloric acid, 36.5-38.0%, BioReagent, Molecular Biology
Sigma-Aldrich
3-Ethyl-2,4-pentanedione, mixture of tautomers, 98%
Sigma-Aldrich
Sodium sulfate, BioXtra, ≥99.0%
Sigma-Aldrich
Sodium sulfate, ≥99.0%, suitable for plant cell culture
Supelco
Hydrochloric acid solution, volumetric, 0.1 M HCl (0.1N), endotoxin free
Supelco
Hydrogen chloride – ethanol, ~1.25 M HCl, derivatization grade (GC derivatization), LiChropur