Merck
  • Home
  • Search Results
  • Antiviral immunity of Anopheles gambiae is highly compartmentalized, with distinct roles for RNA interference and gut microbiota.

Antiviral immunity of Anopheles gambiae is highly compartmentalized, with distinct roles for RNA interference and gut microbiota.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America (2014-12-31)
Guillaume Carissimo, Emilie Pondeville, Melanie McFarlane, Isabelle Dietrich, Christian Mitri, Emmanuel Bischoff, Christophe Antoniewski, Catherine Bourgouin, Anna-Bella Failloux, Alain Kohl, Kenneth D Vernick
ABSTRACT

Arboviruses are transmitted by mosquitoes and other arthropods to humans and animals. The risk associated with these viruses is increasing worldwide, including new emergence in Europe and the Americas. Anopheline mosquitoes are vectors of human malaria but are believed to transmit one known arbovirus, o'nyong-nyong virus, whereas Aedes mosquitoes transmit many. Anopheles interactions with viruses have been little studied, and the initial antiviral response in the midgut has not been examined. Here, we determine the antiviral immune pathways of the Anopheles gambiae midgut, the initial site of viral infection after an infective blood meal. We compare them with the responses of the post-midgut systemic compartment, which is the site of the subsequent disseminated viral infection. Normal viral infection of the midgut requires bacterial flora and is inhibited by the activities of immune deficiency (Imd), JAK/STAT, and Leu-rich repeat immune factors. We show that the exogenous siRNA pathway, thought of as the canonical mosquito antiviral pathway, plays no detectable role in antiviral defense in the midgut but only protects later in the systemic compartment. These results alter the prevailing antiviral paradigm by describing distinct protective mechanisms in different body compartments and infection stages. Importantly, the presence of the midgut bacterial flora is required for full viral infectivity to Anopheles, in contrast to malaria infection, where the presence of the midgut bacterial flora is required for protection against infection. Thus, the enteric flora controls a reciprocal protection tradeoff in the vector for resistance to different human pathogens.

MATERIALS
Product Number
Brand
Product Description

Sigma-Aldrich
DAPI, for nucleic acid staining
Sigma-Aldrich
Urea, ACS reagent, 99.0-100.5%
Sigma-Aldrich
Urea, ReagentPlus®, ≥99.5%, pellets
Sigma-Aldrich
Urea, powder, BioReagent, for molecular biology, suitable for cell culture
Sigma-Aldrich
Urea, meets USP testing specifications
Sigma-Aldrich
Urea, suitable for electrophoresis
Sigma-Aldrich
Urea, puriss., meets analytical specification of Ph. Eur., BP, USP, 99.0-100.5%, 99.0-101.0% (calc. on dry substance)
Sigma-Aldrich
Urea, BioUltra, for molecular biology, ≥99% (T)
Sigma-Aldrich
Urea, puriss. p.a., ACS reagent, reag. Ph. Eur., ≥99%
Sigma-Aldrich
Urea, BioXtra, pH 7.5-9.5 (20 °C, 5 M in H2O)
Supelco
Urea, 8 M (after reconstitution with 16 mL high purity water)
Urea, European Pharmacopoeia (EP) Reference Standard
USP
Urea, United States Pharmacopeia (USP) Reference Standard
Sigma-Aldrich
Urea, ReagentPlus®, ≥99.5%
Supelco
Urea, analytical standard
Sigma-Aldrich
Urea, Vetec, reagent grade, 99%
Millipore
Urea solution, suitable for microbiology, 40% in H2O
Sigma-Aldrich
Urea solution, 40 % (w/v) in H2O
Sigma-Aldrich
Urea solution, BioUltra, ~8 M in H2O
Sigma-Aldrich
Urea-12C, 99.9 atom % 12C