Sign In to View Organizational & Contract Pricing.
About This Item
Linear Formula:
K2Ni(CN)4
CAS Number:
Molecular Weight:
240.96
UNSPSC Code:
12352302
PubChem Substance ID:
EC Number:
238-082-7
MDL number:
assay
>99.9% trace metals basis
form
powder
reaction suitability
reagent type: catalyst
core: nickel
SMILES string
[K+].[K+].N#C[Ni--](C#N)(C#N)C#N
InChI
1S/4CN.2K.Ni/c4*1-2;;;/q;;;;2*+1;-2
InChI key
QOOHKAMDWOKKBR-UHFFFAOYSA-N
signalword
Danger
hcodes
Hazard Classifications
Acute Tox. 1 Dermal - Acute Tox. 2 Inhalation - Acute Tox. 2 Oral - Aquatic Acute 1 - Aquatic Chronic 1
supp_hazards
Storage Class
6.1A - Combustible acute toxic Cat. 1 and 2 / very toxic hazardous materials
wgk
WGK 3
flash_point_f
Not applicable
flash_point_c
Not applicable
Choose from one of the most recent versions:
Already Own This Product?
Find documentation for the products that you have recently purchased in the Document Library.
C M Kao et al.
Letters in applied microbiology, 41(2), 216-220 (2005-07-22)
The ability of Azotobacter vinelandii, a N(2)-fixing bacterium, to biodegrade tetracyanonickelate (TCN) was evaluated. The amounts of TCN were measured spectrophotometrically. Ammonia was determined colorimetrically by the indophenol method. The produced methane from TCN conversion by A. vinelandii was detected
Fehmi Bardak et al.
Spectrochimica acta. Part A, Molecular and biomolecular spectroscopy, 71(5), 1896-1900 (2008-08-23)
In this study the M(IN)(2)Ni(CN)(4) [where M: Co, Ni, and Cd, and IN: isonicotinic acid, abbreviated to M-Ni-IN] tetracyanonickelate and some metal halide complexes with the following stoichiometries: M(IN)(6)X(2) (M: Co; X: Cl and Br, and M: Ni; X: Cl
S F Chow et al.
The Journal of biological chemistry, 261(16), 7264-7269 (1986-06-05)
The structure of the rhodanese-tetracyanonickelate (E X Ni(CN)2-4) complex has been characterized here in spectral and physical studies using urea as a structural perturbant. UV difference absorption, sedimentation velocity ultracentrifugation, fluorescence, and circular dichroism data show no significant conformational differences

