MilliporeSigma
  • Off-resonance surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy from gold nanorod suspensions as a function of aspect ratio: not what we thought.

Off-resonance surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy from gold nanorod suspensions as a function of aspect ratio: not what we thought.

ACS nano (2013-02-27)
Sean T Sivapalan, Brent M Devetter, Timothy K Yang, Thomas van Dijk, Matthew V Schulmerich, P Scott Carney, Rohit Bhargava, Catherine J Murphy
ABSTRACT

Design of nanoparticles for surface-enhanced Raman scattering (SERS) within suspensions is more involved than simply maximizing the local field enhancement. The enhancement at the nanoparticle surface and the extinction of both the incident and scattered light during propagation act in concert to determine the observed signal intensity. Here we explore these critical aspects of signal generation and propagation through experiment and theory. We synthesized gold nanorods of six different aspect ratios in order to obtain longitudinal surface plasmon resonances that incrementally spanned 600-800 nm. The Raman reporter molecule methylene blue was trap-coated near the surface of each nanorod sample, generating SERS spectra, which were used to compare Raman signals. The average number of reporter molecules per nanorod was quantified against known standards using electrospray ionization liquid chromatography mass spectrometry. The magnitude of the observed Raman signal is reported for each aspect ratio along with the attenuation due to extinction in suspension. The highest Raman signal was obtained from the nanorod suspension with a plasmon resonance blue-shifted from the laser excitation wavelength. This finding is in contrast to SERS measurements obtained from molecules dried onto the surface of roughened or patterned metal substrates where the maximum observed signal is near or red-shifted from the laser excitation wavelength. We explain these results as a competition between SERS enhancement and extinction, at the excitation and scattered wavelengths, on propagation through the sample.

MATERIALS
Product Number
Brand
Product Description

Sigma-Aldrich
Poly(acrylic acid) solution, average Mw ~2,000, 50 wt. % in H2O, electronic grade
Sigma-Aldrich
Poly(acrylic acid) solution, average Mw ~100,000, 35 wt. % in H2O
Sigma-Aldrich
Poly(acrylic acid, sodium salt) solution, average Mw ~1,200, 45 wt. % in H2O
Sigma-Aldrich
Poly(acrylic acid, sodium salt) solution, average Mw ~8,000, 45 wt. % in H2O
Sigma-Aldrich
Poly(acrylic acid) solution, average Mw ~250,000, 35 wt. % in H2O
Sigma-Aldrich
Poly(acrylic acid), average Mv ~1,250,000
Sigma-Aldrich
Poly(acrylic acid)
Sigma-Aldrich
Poly(acrylic acid), average Mv ~4,000,000
Sigma-Aldrich
Poly(acrylic acid sodium salt), average Mw ~5,100 by GPC, powder
Supelco
Poly(acrylic acid), analytical standard, average Mn 130,000 (Typical)
Sigma-Aldrich
Poly(acrylic acid), average Mv ~450,000
Supelco
Poly(acrylic acid sodium salt), analytical standard, for GPC, 16,000
Sigma-Aldrich
Methylene Blue solution, for microscopy, concentrate according to Ehrlich, concentrated, aqueous solution
Sigma-Aldrich
Poly(acrylic acid), average Mv ~3,000,000
Sigma-Aldrich
Poly(acrylic acid sodium salt), average Mw ~2,100