MilliporeSigma
  • Home
  • Search Results
  • A randomised single-blind comparison of the effectiveness of Tristel Fuse (chlorine dioxide) as an office-based fluid soak, with Cidex OPA (ortho-phthaldehyde) using an automated endoscopic reprocessor (AER) as high-level disinfection for flexible cystoscopes.

A randomised single-blind comparison of the effectiveness of Tristel Fuse (chlorine dioxide) as an office-based fluid soak, with Cidex OPA (ortho-phthaldehyde) using an automated endoscopic reprocessor (AER) as high-level disinfection for flexible cystoscopes.

BJU international (2013-10-30)
Peter J Gilling, Rana M Reuther, Michael Addidle, Michelle M Lockhart, Christopher M Frampton, Mark R Fraundorfer
ABSTRACT

To compare the effectiveness, safety and cost of Tristel Fuse (chlorine dioxide) with Cidex OPA (ortho-phthaldehyde; 1,2-benzenedicarboxaldehyde) in an automated endoscopic reprocessor (AER) for high-level disinfection of flexible cystoscopes. A randomised single-blind study comparing the high-level disinfectants Tristel Fuse as a simple office-based soak and Cidex OPA using an AER was performed. Participants were 'blinded' to the agent used for disinfection of the flexible cystoscopes. All patients had negative mid-stream urine at baseline, (MSU) no symptoms suggestive of urinary tract infection (UTI) on the day of investigation, no recent antibiotic use or current indwelling urinary catheter. Patients who underwent cystoscopic biopsy during the procedure were excluded. A urine analysis was done before and 3-5 days after cystoscopy and multiple equipment cultures were performed. The Urogenital Distress Inventory (UDI-6 + two questions from the 'long-form'), symptom and quality-of-life scores were assessed before and after cystoscopy as were ease-of-use assessments and a full cost analysis. In all, 180 of 465 screened participants were randomised 1:1 and the mean age was 72.1 years, 17% were females and 57% of procedures were performed for bladder tumour surveillance. The urine analysis was positive in 5.4% of patients in each group and 29% (Tristel) vs 20% (Cidex) of patients had urinary leukocyturia (p = ns) after cystoscopy. The turnover (minutes per cycle) was 7.5 (Tristel) vs 26.7 (Cidex). The per-procedure costs were $11.67 (American dollars) for Tristel Fuse and $21.82 for Cidex OPA with fixed costs of $4788 for Tristel Fuse and $60,514 for Cidex OPA. Tristel Fuse appears to be as effective and more cost-effective than Cidex OPA for high-level disinfection of flexible cystoscopes. This has significant cost implications for the office urologist.

MATERIALS
Product Number
Brand
Product Description

Sigma-Aldrich
Phthaldialdehyde, suitable for HPLC fluorimetric detection of amino acids, ≥99% (HPLC), powder
Sigma-Aldrich
Phthaldialdehyde, ≥97% (HPLC), powder (may contain lumps)
Sigma-Aldrich
Glutaraldehyde solution, Grade I, 8% in H2O, specially purified for use as an electron microscopy fixative or other sophisticated use
Sigma-Aldrich
Glutaraldehyde solution, Grade II, 25% in H2O
Sigma-Aldrich
Glutaraldehyde solution, Grade I, 25% in H2O, specially purified for use as an electron microscopy fixative
Sigma-Aldrich
Glutaraldehyde solution, Grade I, 50% in H2O, specially purified for use as an electron microscopy fixative or other sophisticated use
Sigma-Aldrich
Glutaraldehyde solution, Grade I, 70% in H2O, specially purified for use as an electron microscopy fixative or other sophisticated use
Sigma-Aldrich
Glutaraldehyde solution, 50% in H2O, suitable for photographic applications
Sigma-Aldrich
Phthaldialdehyde, for fluorescence, ≥99.0% (HPLC)
Sigma-Aldrich
Glutaraldehyde solution, 50 wt. % in H2O
Sigma-Aldrich
Phthaldialdehyde Reagent, Solution Incomplete
Sigma-Aldrich
Phthaldialdehyde Reagent, Solution Complete