EMAIL THIS PAGE TO A FRIEND

Journal of occupational and environmental hygiene

A comparison of two sampling methods for the detection of airborne methylene bisphenyl diisocyanate.


PMID 23442121

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to determine if there was a significant difference between two readily available sampling methodologies for airborne methylene bisphenyl diisocyanate (MDI), which is an essential precursor in the spray-on truck bed lining industry. Seventy-two personal airborne samples of MDI were collected and analyzed from nine spray-on truck bed liner businesses in northern Colorado. Wide ranges of exposure concentrations were encountered during the spray-on application, including concentrations that exceeded the OSHA permissible exposure limit. The highest airborne MDI concentration measured was 690 ppb. A statistically significant difference between field-desorbed and laboratory-desorbed methods was determined. The field-desorbed sampling methodology yielded consistently higher MDI concentrations than the laboratory-desorbed sampling methodology, which suggests that immediate desorption minimizes isocyanate loss and potential underestimations. Results from the analysis of variance also indicated that different facility factors and environmental conditions within each company, such as the use of ventilation or humidity level, affected the MDI concentrations, indicating the potential for better mitigation of exposures using the hierarchy of controls.

Related Materials

Product #

Image

Description

Molecular Formula

Add to Cart

33428
4,4′-MDI, analytical standard
C15H10N2O2
256439
4,4′-Methylenebis(phenyl isocyanate), 98%
C15H10N2O2