EMAIL THIS PAGE TO A FRIEND

The European journal of prosthodontics and restorative dentistry

The effect of denture design and fixatives on the retention of mandibular complete dentures tested on a novel in-vitro edentulous model.


PMID 23888529

Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of the design (extension and adaptation) of a mandibular complete acrylic denture and the use of denture adhesives using a novel in-vitro edentulous model. The model is a highly anatomically accurate replica based on a moderately resorbed human mandibular edentulous arch. The model has been designed and fabricated by means of an elaborate clinical and technical process that employs synthetic elastomeric materials with properties that attempts to reproduce in-vitro characteristics of the soft tissues overlying the ridges and immediate reflected tissues. This model was used to measure and compare the retention of mandibular dentures ofvarying designs (well-fitting, over- and under-extended) with and without the aid of denture fixatives. Retention tests were conducted with different volumes of artificial saliva at a cross head speed of 50 mm/min with 4 equidistant holding points on the denture occlusal surface, using a universal tensile testing machine in an axial pull direction. The effect of three denture adhesives on denture retention was also tested on the same denture types at different times over a period of 5 hours and beyond. The in-vitro model presented can be effectively used to test the retention of mandibular complete dentures. The speed of dislodgement force and amount of saliva are important variables in mandibular denture retention. The retention of well-fitting dentures was statistically higher than that of ill-fitting dentures. A significantly higher retention force was needed to dislodge mandibular dentures (well and ill-fitting dentures) when using a denture adhesive.

Related Materials

Product #

Image

Description

Molecular Formula

Add to Cart

238961
Calcium sulfate, with indicator, 4 mesh
CaO4S
456071
Calcium sulfate, with indicator, 6 mesh
CaO4S
238988
Calcium sulfate, with indicator, 8 mesh
CaO4S
238910
Calcium sulfate, without indicator, 4 mesh
CaO4S
238937
Calcium sulfate, without indicator, 8 mesh
CaO4S
255696
Calcium sulfate, ≥99.99% trace metals basis
CaO4S
237132
Calcium sulfate, −325 mesh, 99%
CaO4S
C3771
Calcium sulfate dihydrate, ReagentPlus®, ≥99%
CaO4S · 2H2O
12056
Calcium sulfate dihydrate, puriss., meets analytical specification of NF, E 516, 99.0-101.0% (based on anhydrous substance)
CaO4S · 2H2O
255548
Calcium sulfate dihydrate, ACS reagent, 98%
CaO4S · 2H2O
12090
Calcium sulfate hemihydrate, purum, ≥97.0%
CaO4S · 0.5H2O
05-1080
Calcium sulfate hemihydrate, CP, calcined
CaO4S · 0.5H2O
C9481
Carboxymethylcellulose sodium, meets USP testing specifications, Medium viscosity
C5678
Carboxymethylcellulose sodium salt, low viscosity
C4888
Carboxymethylcellulose sodium salt, Medium viscosity
C5013
Carboxymethylcellulose sodium salt, High viscosity
737828
Drierite, with indicator, 10-20 mesh
CaO4S
416339
Poly(methyl vinyl ether-alt-maleic anhydride), average Mw ~216,000, average Mn ~80,000
416320
Poly(methyl vinyl ether-alt-maleic anhydride), average Mw ~1,080,000, average Mn ~311,000
419273
Sodium carboxymethyl cellulose, average Mw ~90,000
419311
Sodium carboxymethyl cellulose, average Mw ~250,000, degree of substitution 0.7
419303
Sodium carboxymethyl cellulose, average Mw ~250,000, degree of substitution 0.9
419281
Sodium carboxymethyl cellulose, average Mw ~250,000, degree of substitution 1.2
419338
Sodium carboxymethyl cellulose, average Mw ~700,000