EMAIL THIS PAGE TO A FRIEND

The Journal of oral implantology

Retentiveness of various luting agents used with implant-supported prosthesis: an in vitro study.


PMID 25506659

Abstract

Desired retrievability of cemented implant-supported fixed prosthesis makes the retentive strength of cementing agents an important consideration. The aim of the study was to evaluate the retentiveness of purposely designed implant cement and compare its retentiveness with dental cements that are commonly used with implant systems. Ten implant analogs were embedded in auto-polymerizing acrylic resin blocks and titanium abutments were attached to them. Fifty standardized copings were waxed directly on the abutment and casted. The cements used were: (1) resin-bonded zinc oxide eugenol cement, (2) purposely designed implant cement, (3) zinc phosphate cement, (4) zinc polycarboxylate cement, and (5) glass ionomer cement. After cementation, each sample was subjected to a pull-out test using universal testing machine and loads required to remove the crowns were recorded. The mean values and standard deviations of cement failure loads were analyzed using ANOVA and Bonferroni test. The mean values (± SD) of loads at failure (n = 10) for various cements were as follows (N): resin-bonded zinc oxide eugenol cement 394.62 (± 9.76), Premier implant cement 333.86 (± 18.91), zinc phosphate cement 629.30 (± 20.65), zinc polycarboxylate cement 810.08 (± 11.52), and glass ionomer cement 750.17 (± 13.78). The results do not suggest that one cement type is better than another, but they do provide a ranking order of the cements regarding their ability to retain the prosthesis and facilitate easy retrievability.

Related Materials

Product #

Image

Description

Molecular Formula

Add to Cart

79891
Eugenol, certified reference material, TraceCERT®
C10H12O2
35995
Eugenol, PESTANAL®, analytical standard
C10H12O2
E5000000
Eugenol, European Pharmacopoeia (EP) Reference Standard
C10H12O2
01050595
Eugenol, primary reference standard
C10H12O2
PHR1269
Eugenol, Pharmaceutical Secondary Standard; Certified Reference Material
C10H12O2
F1635
Formaldehyde solution, contains 10-15% methanol as stabilizer, 37 wt. % in H2O
CH2O
15513
Formaldehyde solution, meets analytical specification of Ph. Eur., BP, 35 wt. %, contains 10% methanol as stabilizer
CH2O
IRMM531A
Titanium, IRMM® certified Reference Material, 0.1 mm foil
Ti
IRMM531B
Titanium, IRMM® certified Reference Material, 0.5 mm foil
Ti
IRMM531C
Titanium, IRMM® certified Reference Material, 0.5 mm wire
Ti
305812
Titanium, crystalline, 5-10 mm, ≥99.99% trace metals basis (purity exclusive of Na and K content)
Ti
433667
Titanium, evaporation slug, diam. × L 6.3 mm × 6.3 mm, ≥99.99% trace metals basis
Ti
369489
Titanium, foil, thickness 2.0 mm, 99.7% trace metals basis
Ti
348805
Titanium, foil, thickness 0.5 mm, 99.99% trace metals basis
Ti
267481
Titanium, foil, thickness 0.25 mm, 99.99% trace metals basis
Ti
267503
Titanium, foil, thickness 0.25 mm, 99.7% trace metals basis
Ti
460397
Titanium, foil, thickness 0.127 mm, ≥99.99% trace metals basis
Ti
348791
Titanium, foil, thickness 0.127 mm, 99.7% trace metals basis
Ti
348813
Titanium, foil, thickness 0.1 mm, 99.99% trace metals basis
Ti
348821
Titanium, foil, thickness 0.05 mm, 99.99% trace metals basis
Ti
348848
Titanium, foil, thickness 0.025 mm, 99.98% trace metals basis
Ti
268496
Titanium, powder, −100 mesh, 99.7% trace metals basis
Ti
366994
Titanium, powder, <45 μm avg. part. size, 99.98% trace metals basis
Ti
513415
Titanium, nanoparticles, dispersion, <100 nm particle size, in mineral oil, 98.5% trace metals basis
Ti
347132
Titanium, rod, diam. 6.35 mm, 99.99% trace metals basis
Ti
268526
Titanium, sponge, 3-19 mm, 99.5% trace metals basis
Ti
348856
Titanium, wire, diam. 2.0 mm, 99.99% trace metals basis
Ti
266035
Titanium, wire, diam. 1.0 mm, 99.99% trace metals basis
Ti
267902
Titanium, wire, diam. 0.81 mm, 99.7% trace metals basis
Ti
348864
Titanium, wire, diam. 0.5 mm, 99.99% trace metals basis
Ti