DSM MonoPhos™

ChemFiles 2006, 6.8, 7.


In collaboration with DSM, we are pleased to offer a range of MonoPhosligands for the research market. Feringa and co-workers have invented a diverse array of these chiral, monodentate phosphoramidites based on the privileged BINOL platform.1 The MonoPhos family has exhibited high levels of enantiocontrol in synthetic transformations ranging from metalcatalyzed asymmetric 1,4-additions of organometallic reagents to allylic alkylations to desymmetrization of meso-cycloalkene oxides.2

back to top

Advantages of the MonoPhos™ Ligands

  • Superior enantiocontrol in numerous transformations
  • High activities at low catalyst loadings
  • Hydrogenations under low-pressure conditions
  • Applied in tandem reactions to yield valuable chiral organics
  • First-to-market exclusivity for selected portfolio ligands

back to top

Representative Applications

The reactivity profile of these innovative chiral ligands is covered below and highlights the impressive breadth of valuable transformations mediated by the various portfolio products. In many documented cases, specific ligands have displayed unprecedented selectivities in reactions that form, for instance, chiral quaternary centers that cannot be readily generated via alternative methodologies.

Asymmetric 1,4-additions of Organometallic Reagents

Feringa and co-workers exploited the high activity of the (S,R,R)-phosphoramidite ligand shown in Scheme 14 in copper-catalyzed 1,4-additions of organozinc reagents to cyclohexenones.1 Interestingly, the in situ formed zinc species originating from the cyclohexenone is readily trapped via a palladium-catalyzed allylation. The Feringa group then completed a formal annulation process through a palladium-catalyzed Wacker oxidation, followed by an aldol cyclization. The high (96%) enantioselectivity of this methodology is completely retained throughout this synthetic strategy (Scheme 14).

Scheme 14

High potential also exists for the use of organoaluminum reagents in asymmetric conjugate addition reactions, because of their commercial availability and proof of concept in carboalumination reactions. Woodward and co-workers have now pioneered the enantioselective phosphoramidite-catalyzed 1,4-additions of organoaluminum reagents to enones.3 This methodology provides facile access to chiral ketones with excellent enantioselectivities and in good yields (Scheme 15).

Scheme 15

Highly Asymmetric Rhodium-Catalyzed Hydrogenation

Feringa has also gone to great lengths to develop structurally varied MonoPhos™ ligands in industrially useful transformations such as asymmetric hydrogenation.4 Impressively, the (S)-N-benzyl- N-methyl-MonoPhos™ derivative shown below has been utilized in highly selective hydrogenations of (E)-N-acylated dehydro-b-amino acid esters, affording the corresponding enantiopure b-amino acid derivatives (Scheme 16).4a The authors found that this ligand, after being screened versus related chiral phosphoramidites, afforded the highest enantiocontrol in hydrogenations albeit at slightly longer reaction times.

Scheme 16

The Feringa research group has broadened the substrate scope of the asymmetric hydrogenation reaction by generating another chiral center on the amine moiety of the phosphoramidite ligand. Amazingly, this fine ligand tuning produces a very active and productive catalyst, which efficiently hydrogenates a wide range of acetamido derivatives in less time than the corresponding Me- DuPhos analogs.4a Note that the chiral (S,R)-phosphoramidite ligand below is the only ligand known to afford enantioselectivities for the substrate shown greater than 90% (Scheme 17).

Scheme 17

Recently, Feringa’s research group prepared additional structurally varied phosphoramidite ligands for rhodium-catalyzed asymmetric hydrogenations. The aptly named PipPhos and MorfPhos ligands (Scheme 18) contain piperidinyl and morpholinyl subunits, respectively, and are examples of easily synthesized chiral ligands for highly effective enantioselective transformations. Under mild reaction conditions including low H2 pressure, this catalyst system yields unprecedented enantioselectivities for several substrates such as dimethyl itaconate and a-dehydroamino ester derivatives (Scheme 19).5

Scheme 18(665479)(665487)

Scheme 19

Asymmetric Regioselective Allylic Aminations

Hartwig and co-workers have succeeded in developing highly selective iridium catalysts with (R,R,R)-phosphoramidite L*.2g The allylic aminations of a wide variety of achiral allylic esters proceeded with total conversion and superb regioselectivity in many cases. The reaction shown clearly illustrates the power of this methodology, wherein cinnamyl acetate was converted to the allylic benzyl amine 3 in excellent yield and enantiopurity (Scheme 20). The authors mentioned that these valuable amination reactions were mediated by air-stable Ir complexes at ambient temperatures, which should lead to wide acceptance of this catalyst in bench-top organic synthesis.

Scheme 20

As a complement to the Hartwig chemistry, Helmchen and co-workers have performed highly enantioselective iridiumcatalyzed intra- and intermolecular aminations with N-nucleophiles.6a Impressively, dicarbonate 5 reacts smoothly under the reaction conditions to afford the pyrrolidine products 6a and 6b in moderate yield but with excellent selectivity (Scheme 21).

Scheme 21

Asymmetric Hydrovinylation – An Efficient Route to All-Carbon Quaternary Centers

These highly practical enantioselective reactions have been accomplished by RajanBabu’s research group at Ohio State University.7 The generation of all-carbon quaternary centers is extremely attractive to drug discovery groups, as evidenced in the example shown. Note that the asymmetric hydrovinylation of substituted vinylarenes offers an attractive, general method for creating an asymmetric center (Scheme 22). The low ligand loadings, excellent yields, and superb enantioselectivities ensure that this methodology can be utilized in the production of chiral building blocks and directly applied to the synthesis of natural products such as Lyngbyatoxin A.8

Scheme 22

Zhang and RajanBabu have also extended this methodology to the asymmetric hydrovinylation of 1,3-dienes. 1,3-dienes were found to be less reactive than the vinylarene derivatives, thus higher temperatures were applied to drive adequate conversions. Under these conditions, the hydrovinylation of conjugated 1,3-diene 7 with the (S,R,R)-phosphoramidite ligand gave exquisite regio- and enantioselectivities (Scheme 23).9

Scheme 23

Asymmetric Allylic Substitution Reactions

The (R)-MonoPhos™ ligand has been effectively utilized in the enantioselective, iridium-catalyzed allylic substitution reaction.10 Simply mixing an iridium precatalyst and the ligand in THF in the presence of LiCl creates a highly active catalyst, which generates a stereogenic C–C bond center in good to excellent enantioselectivities (Scheme 24). The high product yields and short reaction times further accentuate this methodology for application to the expeditious construction of chiral building blocks.

Scheme 24

back to top


A powerful family of monodentate phosphine ligands has been developed on the well known BINOL backbone, which demonstrates both higher activities and higher enantioselectivities in asymmetric transformations when compared to the majority of bidentate chiral phosphines. These phosphoramidite ligands are accessible in a concise, linear fashion and display robust stability when combined with rhodium precatalysts. We have a range of phosphoramidite ligands commercially available that differ in the amine functionality of the ligand architecture, allowing for rapid optimization of catalyst performance.

back to top




  1. Feringa, B. L. Acc. Chem. Res. 2000, 33, 346.
  2. (a) Feringa, B. L. et al. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 1997, 36, 2620. (b) Martina, S. L. X. et al. Tetrahedron Lett. 2005, 46, 7159. (c) Malda, H. et al. Org. Lett. 2001, 3, 1169. (d) Alexakis, A. et al. Chem. Commun. 2005, 2843. (e) Streiff, S. et al. Chem. Commun. 2005, 2957. (f) Bertozzi, F. et al. Org. Lett. 2000, 2, 933. (g) Hartwig, J. F. et al. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 15164.
  3. Alexakis, A.; Albrow, V.; Biswas, K.; Augustin, M.; Prieto, O.; Woodward, S. Chem. Commun., 2005, 2843.
  4. (a) Pena, D. et al. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 14552. (b) Van den Berg, M. et al. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2003, 345, 308.
  5. Bernsmann, H. et al. J. Org. Chem. 2005, 70, 943.
  6. (a) Helmchen, G. et al. Chem. Commun. 2005, 3541. (b) Helmchen, G. et al. Chem. Commun. 2005, 2957.
  7. RajanBabu, T. V. et al. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 5620.
  8. Gerwick, W. H. et al. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 11432.
  9. RajanBabu, T. V. et al. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 54.
  10. Helmchen, G. et al. Chem. Commun. 1999, 741.

back to top

Related Links