Recent Advances in Solid-State Rechargeable Batteries

Chunwen Sun,1,2 Material Matters™, 2020, 15.2

1 CAS Center for Excellence in Nanoscience, Beijing Institute of Nanoenergy and Nanosystems, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100083, China
2 School of Nanoscience and Technology, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China


Article Sections


Lithium-ion batteries (LIBs) have been considered the most promising energy storage devices due to their relatively higher energy density.1,2 LIBs find many uses in a variety of applications, such as portable electronics, electric and hybrid electric vehicles, and stationary energy storage systems, as well as others. Compared with LIBs, sodium-ion batteries have recently attracted much attention as an alternative to LIBs for electric energy storage applications owing to the low cost and abundant sodium resources.3 Aluminum ion batteries are promising alternatives due to their advantages of low cost, nontoxic nature, and earth abundance as well as the three electron redox couples that provide a competitive storage capacity compared to the single-electron, lithium-ion storage.4,5 The traditional LIBs with organic liquid electrolytes have some drawbacks such as safety issues and low-energy density. However, solid-state Li batteries are expected to use metallic Li anodes due to the use of non-flammable solid electrolytes, which enable a significant increase in energy density. The introduction of metal anodes makes solid-state batteries (SSBs) promising for next-generation high energy density batteries. Particularly, lithium metal has a high theoretical specific capacity (3860 mAh g-1), low-density (0.53 g cm-3), and the lowest electrochemical potential (~3.04 V vs. standard hydrogen electrode (SHE)). Compared to liquid electrolyte-based Li-ion batteries, SSBs are believed to be safer, have longer life cycles, higher energy density, and fewer packaging requirements.6–12 Therefore, SSBs have received considerable attention during the last decades. In this short review, we briefly describe the advances in solidstate Li, Na, and Al batteries as well as the existing challenges while also proposing several possible research directions for circumventing the challenges.

Fundamentals of Solid Electrolytes in Solid- State Batteries

Theory of Ion Conduction in Solid-State Electrolytes

For the inorganic solid electrolyte, ionic conduction follows the Arrhenius temperature dependence (Equation 1):


where σi denotes ionic conductivity, A represents the preexponential factor, T signifies the absolute temperature (in kelvins), Ea is the activation energy, and k is the Boltzmann constant. To calculate the mobility of the charge carrier, use Equation 2:


In this equation, q represents the carrier charge, D denotes the diffusion coefficient of metal ions, k is the Boltzmann constant, and T is the absolute temperature.13 The motion of a single particle jumping from an occupied site to an adjacent energetically equivalent unoccupied site may be described by a random-walk theory.14 The relationship between the conductivity and the diffusion coefficient follows the Nernest–Einstein Equation (Equation 3):


where Nc is the number of mobile ions. The ionic conductivity is proportional to the Nc and D. For polymer electrolytes, the ionic conductivity usually follows the Arrhenius or Vogel–Tammann–Fulcher (VTF) equations or both of them together.15 Usually, the VTF behavior seems more suitable for the solid polymer electrolytes, as described by Equation 4



where B is the pseudo-activation energy of the conductivity, and T0 is the reference temperature, which falls typically 10–50 K below the glass transition temperature (Tg). The ionic motion behavior correlates with the long-range motions of the polymer segments. Effective media theories describe the conductivity of composite electrolyte materials consisting of a conducting and an insulating phase.16

Structures and Electrochemical Processes of Solid-State Li Batteries

Figure 1 schematically shows the structure of an all-solidstate battery. The battery consists of a cathode, a solid electrolyte (Mn+ ion conductors, M=Li, Na, Al), an anode, and current collectors. The solid electrolyte serves as both an ionic conductor and separator in the SSBs. The electrodes are attached to both sides of the electrolyte. Solid-state batteries need fewer requirements on packaging and thus may reduce the fabrication cost. Mn+ ions deintercalated from the anode during discharge are transported to the cathode via the solid electrolyte, while the electrons pass through the external circuit powering a device. During the charge/discharge processes, the potential for reactions and strain forming to occur in the electrodes may cause interfacial delamination. This phenomenon is detrimental to the cycling stability of the cells. In general, the utilization of surface modification techniques such as ball-milling, PLD-coating, and softening glassing methods, form the intimate interfacial contact between electrode and electrolyte.6

back to top


Schematic illustration of a solid-state battery

Figure 1. Schematic illustration of a solid-state battery based on Mn+ ion conduction. Reproduced with permission from reference 6, copyright 2017 Elsevier.


Progress on Solid-State Lithium Batteries

Solid lithium electrolytes (fast Li-ion conductors) constitute an essential component for rechargeable solid-state Li batteries. Generally, solid electrolytes should have high si, negligible se, a wide voltage window, chemical compatibility with the electrodes, and low costs. Several kinds of electrolytes such as Li3N, LiPON, Li2S-based glass, NASICON-type oxides Li1+xAlxTi2-x(PO4)3 (LATP), garnet Li7La3Zr2O12 (LLZO), perovskite Li0.05-3xLa0.5+xTiO3, anti-perovskites Li3OCl0.5Br0.5, and polymer electrolytes, have been studied for their good Li-ion conductivity.6 The inorganic electrolytes are usually too hard and brittle for flexible battery applications. However, the mechanical strength of polymer electrolytes is not satisfactory. To solve the problems facing inorganic solid and polymer electrolytes, hybrid electrolyte consisting of a polymer matrix and inorganic filler materials usually have the merits of both of them.

We prepared a garnet, Li7La3Zr2O12-based, hybrid solid electrolyte (HSE) membrane consisting of LLZO particles and poly(vinylidene fluoride-co-hexafluoropropylene) (PVDF– HFP) polymer matrix for high-performance solid-state lithium batteries for the first time.8 The HSE membrane exhibited high ionic conductivity, wide electrochemical windows up to ~5.3 V vs. Li+/Li, and excellent flexibility (Figure 2A–C). The solidstate lithium battery with this HSE membrane, Li metal anode, and the LiFePO4 cathode showed an initial reversible discharge capacity of 120 mAh g-1 at 0.5 C current density at room temperature. The cell showed a capacity retention of 92.5 % at 0.5C after 180 cycles (Figure 3C).


Temperature dependence of the Li+ ion conductivity

Figure 2. A) Temperature dependence of the Li+ ion conductivity of the HSE membranes free of and infiltrated with 20mL liquid electrolyte, respectively. B) Comparison of linear sweep voltammograms of pure PVDF-HFP electrolyte and the HSE. C) Photograph of the HSE membrane in a bent state, D) Photograph of a LED screen showing the letters of BINN, powered by the flexible pouch cell with this hybrid electrolyte. Reproduced with permission from reference 8, copyright 2018 Elsevier Ltd.



charge/discharge curves of the solid-state lithium battery

Figure 3. A) The first charge/discharge curves of the solid-state lithium battery at various current densities. B) Rate performance of the solidstate lithium battery in a potential range of 3.0–3.8 V vs. Li+/Li tested at 25 °C. (c) Cyclability performance tested at 0.5C rate. D) Voltage profile of the lithium plating/stripping cycling in the symmetrical Li|HSE|Li cell at 0.05, 0.1, and 0.2 mA cm-2, respectively. Reproduced with permission from reference 8, copyright 2018 Elsevier Ltd.


Besides developing the solid electrolytes with high ionic conductivity, improving the cyclability of metal batteries requires the stabilization of the metal anode. We reported an organic and inorganic composite membrane (CPM) composed of PVDF-HFP and LLZO particles to protect the Li anode.17 The CPM-modified Li symmetric cell showed no apparent voltage hysteresis over 500 h at 2 mA cm−2. Moreover, the CPM modified Li|LFP cell can stably run 800 cycles at 1C and retain a high average Coulombic efficiency of ~99.95%. We also found that the composite electrolyte membranes consisting of polyacrylonitrile (PAN)-Li6.5La3Zr1.5Ta0.5O12 (LLZTO) matrix as well as dual salts LiClO4 and Mg(ClO4)2 can improve the cycling stability of the lithium battery.18 We found another notable feature worth to noting that the magnesium salt is favorable for facilitating the decomposition of LiPF6 in the electrolyte to produce fluoride ions. Thus, a stable, protective layer of magnesium fluoride forms on the surface of the lithium anode, which can effectively inhibit the growth of lithium dendrites and increase the cycle life of the battery.

Further research to improve the rate performance of solid-state lithium batteries, using the ion-conducting polymer matrix as a binder in preparing the cathode or coating the cathode particles with ion-conducting materials is needed. In addition, a stabilizing lithium metal anode is also necessary to improve the cyclability of solid-state lithium batteries.

back to top

Progress on Solid-State Sodium Batteries

Solid-state sodium batteries have many merits, such as highenergy density, high safety, and serving as an abundant resource of sodium. The investigated solid-state electrolytes include b-alumina (Na2O·11Al2O3), Na3Zr2Si2PO12, Na3P1-xAsxS4 (0 ≤ x ≤ 0.5) Na3PSe4, 94Na3PS4-6Na4SiS4, Na3SbS4, 50Na2S- 50P2S5, 60Na2S-40GeS2, 50Na2S-50SiS2, and others.19 However, low conductivity of solid electrolytes, as well as the high interfacial resistance between electrolyte and electrodes, present two main challenges for practical application of solidstate sodium batteries. To address the low conductivity of solid electrolyte of Na3Zr2Si2PO12 (NZSP) at room temperature, we prepared NaSICON structured Ca2+-doped Na3Zr2Si2PO12 with a higher ionic conductivity of 1.67X10-3 S cm-1 at room temperature.10 Neutron powder diffraction experiments (NPD) unveiled the anisotropic thermal displacements of the Na atoms and a more rigid framework structure by Ca2+ substitution for Zr4+ in NZSP, which is favorable for Na diffusion.

Researchers developed a robust, Ca-doped, NZSP-type monolithic architecture to solve the poor interfacial contact between electrodes and electrolytes. The capacity of the monolithic solid-state battery with sodium metal anode and Na3V2(PO4)3 cathode maintained 94.9 mAh g-1 at 1 C after 450 cycles (Figure 4C). Also, it showed a high rate capability and excellent cyclability. This unique design of monolithic electrolyte architecture provides a promising approach to achieve highperformance solid-state sodium batteries.

Current findings illustrate the need for scaling up the process of monolithic batteries as a key technology in future research. In addition, stabilizing metal Na anodes is a crucial technology to improve the cyclability of solid-state sodium batteries.

back to top


Schematic illustration of the monolithic NZSP solid-state electrolyte

Figure 4. A) Schematic illustration of the monolithic NZSP solid-state electrolyte. B) Schematic of the full SSB. (c~e) Electrochemical performance of the solid-state sodium battery. Reproduced with permission from reference 10, copyright 2019 Wiley-VCH.


Progress on Solid-State Aluminum Batteries

Aluminum (Al) has many merits; it is abundantly available, lightweight, and has three electrons per atom Al. Allowing the achievement of the theoretical specific capacity of 2980 mAh g-1 and a volume capacity of 8046 Ah L-1.4,5 However, the development of an Al battery is hurdled by a solid electrolyte with high Al3+ conductivity. We identified the Al diffusion mechanism in (Al0.2Zr0.8)20/19Nb(PO4)3 through high-temperature NPD experiments and atomic-resolution scanning transmission electron microscopy (STEM) analyses.11 Temperature-driven Al displacement suggests that Al3+ ions diffuse across the structure by a vacancy mechanism. Figure 5A shows a Z-contrast (Z: atomic number) atomic-resolution high-angle annular dark-field (HAADF) image of (Al0.2Zr0.8)20/19Nb(PO4)3 taken along the [010] zone-axis. The yellow arrows indicate Al3+ ion columns, identified in the {10-2} crystallographic planes. Figure 5B presents the intensity profile of the Al3+ ion columns along a dash-dot line A-B in Figure 5A. The variation of the intensity of the Al3+ site suggests a random distribution of Al3+ and vacancies, promoting Al3+ transport in the ionic channel. Moreover, we first reported a rechargeable solid-state Al battery assembled with V2O5 nanorods/rGO (reduced graphene oxide) as a cathode, a dense (Al0.2Zr0.8)20/19Nb(PO4)3 pellet as an electrolyte and Al as the anode. The addition of a small amount of the molten-salt electrolyte consisting of sodium chloride (99.99%) and aluminum chloride (99.9%) (1:1.63 in mole ratio) improved Al3+ ion diffusion in the cathode/electrolyte interface. As shown in Figure 5F, the first discharge specific capacity of the cell reached 7.5 mAh g-1 at 120 °C while the charge specific capacity was 6.5 mAh g-1. Increasing the temperature to 150 °C, the cell showed a capacity value of ~10 mAh g-1.


Schematic diagram of the Swagelok cell

Figure 5. A,B) STEM images of (Al0.2Zr0.8)20/19Nb(PO4)3. C) Schematic diagram of the Swagelok cell used for electrochemical tests. D) The preparation process of Al anode. E) Temperature dependence of the Al3+ ion conductivity of (Al0.2Zr0.8)20/19Nb(PO4)3. F) The first discharge-charge curves of the solid-state V2O5 nanorods/rGO|Al battery tested at 2 mA g-1 at 120 °C and 150 °C, respectively. Reproduced with permission from reference 11, copyright 2018 Chinese Physical Society and IOP Publishing Ltd.


The urgent need for solid electrolytes with high ionic conductivities for solid-state Al batteries demands future research. The effective interfacial contact between electrolyte and electrode are also necessary to achieve high-performance batteries.

Scientists have studied solid-state batteries with other ionconducting electrolytes previously. Magnesium (Mg) batteries present another promising alternative to overcome the issues of poor safety and low energy density faced by LIBs. However, the development of a magnesium battery is plagued by the poor Mg2+ mobility in solids. Ceder et al. first reported fast Mg2+ ion conduction in spinel MgSc2Se4 by ab initio calculation and experimental characterization, which can integrate with Mg cathodes, like spinel-MgTi2S4 and Chevrel-Mo6S8, to make solid-state magnesium batteries.20 Their theoretical calculation also predicted that other chalcogenide spinels might have high Mg2+ mobility.

back to top

Conclusion and Perspective

In summary, due to safety concerns, solid-state batteries have drawn considerable attention in recent years. Although the scientific community has achieved a great deal of progress on the solid-state Li batteries during the past decades, the low ionic conductivity of solid electrolytes and poor interfacial contact between electrolyte and electrodes fall among the two main challenges researchers still face. Solid-state Na and Al batteries are emerging technologies since they have advantages in terms of low costs and high volumetric-energy densities, respectively, compared to Li batteries. The author of this review provided an overview of the progress of solid-state Li, Na, and Al batteries developed in our lab. For solid-state batteries, solid electrolytes are the key components.

Developing solid electrolytes with high ionic conductivity becomes highly desirable. Achieving and maintaining good contact between solid electrodes and solid electrolytes proves essential for reducing the interfacial resistance. Utilizing soft polymer interlayer, a small amount of gel or liquid electrolytes has proven as feasible approaches to improve the ionic transport in the interfaces. Additionally, researchers may employ additional strategies to improve cathode performance. For example, scientists may use the ion-conducting polymer matrix as a binder in preparing the cathode or coating the cathode particles with ion-conducting materials, e.g., LiNbO3 and Li1+xAlxTi2-x(PO4)3 by wet chemical methods.

Moreover, metal anode protection has proven vital for achieving long-term stability of solid-state batteries. In particular, solid electrolyte interphase (SEI) film-forming additives and artificial SEI offer feasible strategies to suppress Li dendrites and improve the long-term stability of lithium batteries. Combining experimental and theoretical calculation approaches enables one to reveal the interface evolution during charge-discharge cycles and thus improve the performances of solid-state batteries. It still takes some time to commercialize the solid-state batteries.

back to top


We acknowledge the financial support of the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 51672029 and 51372271), the National Key R & D Project from the Ministry of Science and Technology, China (2016YFA0202702).




  1. Tarascon, J. M.; Armand, M. Nature 2001, 414, 359–367.
  2. Goodenough, J. B.; Kim, Y. Chem. Mater. 2010, 22, 583–603.
  3. Hou, H. D.; Gan, B. H.; Gong, Y. D.; Chen, N.; Sun, C. W. Inorg. Chem. 2016, 55, 9033–9037.
  4. Elia, G. A.; Marquardt, K.; Hoeppner, K.; Fantini, S.; Lin, R.Y.; Knipping, E.; Peters, W.; Drillet, J. F.; Passerini, S.; Hahn, R. Adv. Mater. 2016, 28, 7564–7579.
  5. Ambroz, F.; Macdonald, T. J.; Nann, T. Adv. Energy Mater. 2017, 7, 1602093.
  6. Sun, C. W.; Liu, J.; Gong, Y. D.; Wilkinson, D. P.; Zhang, J. J. Nano Energy 2017, 33, 363–386.
  7. Hou, H. D.; Xu, Q. K.; Pang, Y. K.; Wang, J. L.; Zhang, C.; Sun, C. W. Adv. Sci. 2017, 4, 1700072.
  8. Zhang, W. Q.; Nie, J. H.; Li, F.; Wang, Z. L.; Sun, C. W. Nano Energy 2018, 45, 413–419.
  9. Ban, X. Y.; Zhang, W. Q.; Chen, N.; Sun, C. W. J. Phys. Chem. C 2018, 122, 9852–9858.
  10. Lu, Y.; Alonso, J. A.; Yi, Q.; Lu, L.; Wang, Z. L.; Sun, C. W. Adv. Energy Mater. 2019, 9, 1901205.
  11. Wang, J.; Sun, C. W.; Gong, Y. D.; Zhang, H. R.; Alonso, J. A.; Fernández-Díaz, M. T.; Wang, Z. L.; Goodenough, J. B. Chin. Phys. B 2018, 27, 128201.
  12. Zhang, Y.; Lai, J. Y.; Gong, Y. D.; Hu, Y. M.; Liu, J.; Sun, C. W.; Wang, Z. L. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2016, 8, 34309–34316.
  13. Sorensen, O. T. Nonstoichiometric Oxides, Academic Press, INC., New York, 1981.
  14. Goodenough, J. B. Mater. Sci. Forum 1986, 7, 1.
  15. Quartarone, E.; Mustarelli, P. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2011, 40, 2525–2540.
  16. Bruggeman, D. A. G. Ann. Phys. (Leipzig) 1935, 24, 636–664.
  17. Zhang, W. Q.; Yi, Q.; Li, S. Y.; Sun, C. W. J. Power Sources 2020, 450, DOI: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2020.227710.
  18. Qiu, G. R.; Sun, C. W. New J. Chem. 2020, 44, 1817–1824.
  19. Hayashi, A.; Masuzawa, N.; Tsuji, F.; Hotehama, C.; Sakuda, A.; Tatsumisago, M. Nat. Commun. 2019, 10, 5266.
  20. Canepa, P.; Bo, S.; Gautam, G. S.; Key, B.; Richards, W. D.; Shi, T.; Tian, Y.; Wang, Y.; Li, J.; Ceder, G. Nat. Commun. 2017, 8, 1759.