Skip to Content
Merck
  • A randomized clinical trial comparing methotrexate and mycophenolate mofetil for noninfectious uveitis.

A randomized clinical trial comparing methotrexate and mycophenolate mofetil for noninfectious uveitis.

Ophthalmology (2014-06-12)
Sivakumar R Rathinam, Manohar Babu, Radhika Thundikandy, Anuradha Kanakath, Natalie Nardone, Elizabeth Esterberg, Salena M Lee, Wayne T A Enanoria, Travis C Porco, Erica N Browne, Rachel Weinrib, Nisha R Acharya
ABSTRACT

To compare the relative effectiveness of methotrexate and mycophenolate mofetil for noninfectious intermediate uveitis, posterior uveitis, or panuveitis. Multicenter, block-randomized, observer-masked clinical trial. Eighty patients with noninfectious intermediate, posterior, or panuveitis requiring corticosteroid-sparing therapy at Aravind Eye Hospitals in Madurai and Coimbatore, India. Patients were randomized to receive 25 mg weekly oral methotrexate or 1 g twice daily oral mycophenolate mofetil and were monitored monthly for 6 months. Oral prednisone and topical corticosteroids were tapered. Masked examiners assessed the primary outcome of treatment success, defined by achieving the following at 5 and 6 months: (1) ≤0.5+ anterior chamber cells, ≤0.5+ vitreous cells, ≤0.5+ vitreous haze and no active retinal/choroidal lesions in both eyes, (2) ≤10 mg of prednisone and ≤2 drops of prednisolone acetate 1% a day, and (3) no declaration of treatment failure because of intolerability or safety. Additional outcomes included time to sustained corticosteroid-sparing control of inflammation, change in best spectacle-corrected visual acuity, resolution of macular edema, adverse events, subgroup analysis by anatomic location, and medication adherence. Forty-one patients were randomized to methotrexate and 39 to mycophenolate mofetil. A total of 67 patients (35 methotrexate, 32 mycophenolate mofetil) contributed to the primary outcome. Sixty-nine percent of patients achieved treatment success with methotrexate and 47% with mycophenolate mofetil (P = 0.09). Treatment failure from adverse events or tolerability was not different by treatment arm (P = 0.99). There were no differences between treatment groups in time to corticosteroid-sparing control of inflammation (P = 0.44), change in best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (P = 0.68), or resolution of macular edema (P = 0.31). There was no statistically significant difference in corticosteroid-sparing control of inflammation between patients receiving methotrexate or mycophenolate mofetil. However, there was a 22% difference in treatment success favoring methotrexate.

MATERIALS
Product Number
Brand
Product Description

Sigma-Aldrich
Methotrexate hydrate, ≥99.0% (sum of enantiomers, HPLC)
Sigma-Aldrich
Methotrexate, meets USP testing specifications
Sigma-Aldrich
Methotrexate hydrate, powder, BioReagent, suitable for cell culture, ≥98% (HPLC)
Sigma-Aldrich
Methotrexate hydrate, ≥98% (HPLC), powder
Sigma-Aldrich
Mycophenolic acid, ≥98%
Sigma-Aldrich
Mycophenolic acid, powder, BioReagent, suitable for cell culture
Supelco
Mycophenolic acid, analytical standard
Methotrexate for peak identification, European Pharmacopoeia (EP) Reference Standard
Mycophenolate mofetil for peak identification, European Pharmacopoeia (EP) Reference Standard
Supelco
Methotrexate, Pharmaceutical Secondary Standard; Certified Reference Material
SAFC
Methotrexate
Methotrexate, European Pharmacopoeia (EP) Reference Standard
Methotrexate for system suitability, European Pharmacopoeia (EP) Reference Standard
Mycophenolate mofetil, European Pharmacopoeia (EP) Reference Standard
USP
Mycophenolate mofetil, United States Pharmacopeia (USP) Reference Standard
Sigma-Aldrich
Mycophenolate mofetil, ≥98% (HPLC)