Direkt zum Inhalt
Merck
  • Development and comparison of two multi-residue methods for the analysis of select pesticides in honey bees, pollen, and wax by gas chromatography-quadrupole mass spectrometry.

Development and comparison of two multi-residue methods for the analysis of select pesticides in honey bees, pollen, and wax by gas chromatography-quadrupole mass spectrometry.

Talanta (2015-06-07)
Yuanbo Li, Rebecca A Kelley, Troy D Anderson, Michael J Lydy
ZUSAMMENFASSUNG

One of the hypotheses that may help explain the loss of honey bee colonies worldwide is the increasing potential for exposure of honey bees to complex mixtures of pesticides. To better understand this phenomenon, two multi-residue methods based on different extraction and cleanup procedures have been developed, and compared for the determination of 11 relevant pesticides in honey bees, pollen, and wax by gas chromatography-quadrupole mass spectrometry. Sample preparatory methods included solvent extraction followed by gel permeation chromatography (GPC) cleanup and cleanup using a dispersive solid-phase extraction with zirconium-based sorbents (Z-Sep). Matrix effects, method detection limits, recoveries, and reproducibility were evaluated and compared. Method detection limits (MDL) of the pesticides for the GPC method in honey bees, pollen, and wax ranged from 0.65 to 5.92 ng/g dw, 0.56 to 6.61 ng/g dw, and 0.40 to 8.30 ng/g dw, respectively, while MDLs for the Z-Sep method were from 0.33 to 4.47 ng/g dw, 0.42 to 5.37 ng/g dw, and 0.51 to 5.34 ng/g dw, respectively. The mean recoveries in all matrices and at three spiking concentrations ranged from 64.4% to 149.5% and 71.9% to 126.2% for the GPC and Z-Sep methods, with relative standard deviation between 1.5-25.3% and 1.3-15.9%, respectively. The results showed that the Z-Sep method was more suitable for the determination of the target pesticides, especially chlorothalonil, in bee hive samples. The Z-Sep method was then validated using a series of field-collected bee hive samples taken from honey bee colonies in Virginia.

MATERIALIEN
Produktnummer
Marke
Produktbeschreibung

Sigma-Aldrich
Dichlormethan, anhydrous, ≥99.8%, contains 40-150 ppm amylene as stabilizer
Sigma-Aldrich
Ethylacetat, anhydrous, 99.8%
Supelco
Supel QuE, Z-Sep+ Tube, centrifuge tube volume 2 mL, pack of 100 ea
Sigma-Aldrich
Poly(tetrafluorethylen), powder (free-flowing), 1 μm particle size
Sigma-Aldrich
Essigsäure, suitable for luminescence, BioUltra, ≥99.5% (GC)
Sigma-Aldrich
5α-Androstan-17β-ol-3-on, ≥97.5%
Sigma-Aldrich
Essigsäure, ≥99.5%, FCC, FG
Sigma-Aldrich
Essigsäure, natural, ≥99.5%, FG
Sigma-Aldrich
Poly(tetrafluorethylen), powder, 200 μm particle size
Sigma-Aldrich
Ethylacetat, ≥99%, FCC, FG
Supelco
Supel QuE, Z-Sep Tube, centrifuge tube volume 2 mL, pack of 100 ea
Sigma-Aldrich
Poly(tetrafluorethylen), powder, >40 μm particle size
Sigma-Aldrich
Aceton, ≥99%, FCC, FG
Supelco
Supel QuE, Z-Sep+ Bulk, pkg of 20 g
Supelco
Supel QuE, Z-Sep Bulk
Sigma-Aldrich
Poly(tetrafluorethylen), beads
Sigma-Aldrich
Ethylacetat
Supelco
Supel QuE, Z-Sep+ Tube, pk of 50, centrifuge tube volume 15 mL , Shaker Compatible
Sigma-Aldrich
Dichlormethan, suitable for HPLC, ≥99.9%, contains 40-150 ppm amylene as stabilizer
Sigma-Aldrich
Aceton, natural, ≥97%
Sigma-Aldrich
Aceton, suitable for HPLC, ≥99.9%
Sigma-Aldrich
Ethylacetat, natural, ≥99%, FCC, FG
Sigma-Aldrich
5α-Androstan-17β-ol-3-on, purum, ≥99.0% (TLC)
Sigma-Aldrich
Poly(tetrafluorethylen), powder, 35 μm particle size
Supelco
Supel QuE, Z-Sep/C18 Tube, pk of 50, centrifuge tube volume 15 mL , Shaker Compatible
Sigma-Aldrich
4,4′-Bis(N-carbazolyl)-1,1′-Biphenyl, 97%
Sigma-Aldrich
Ethylacetat, ReagentPlus®, ≥99.8%
Supelco
Supel QuE, Z-Sep/C18 Tube, centrifuge tube volume 2 mL, pack of 100
Supelco
Supel QuE, Z-Sep Tube, pk of 50, centrifuge tube volume 15 mL , Shaker Compatible
Supelco
Supel QuE, Z-Sep+ with MgSO4 Tube, pk of 50, centrifuge tube volume 15 mL , Shaker Compatible