Saltar al contenido
MilliporeSigma
  • Characterization of the Intestinal Lactobacilli Community following Galactooligosaccharides and Polydextrose Supplementation in the Neonatal Piglet.

Characterization of the Intestinal Lactobacilli Community following Galactooligosaccharides and Polydextrose Supplementation in the Neonatal Piglet.

PloS one (2015-08-15)
Jennifer L Hoeflinger, Dimitri O Kashtanov, Stephen B Cox, Scot E Dowd, Zeina E Jouni, Sharon M Donovan, Michael J Miller
RESUMEN

Recently, prebiotic supplementation of infant formula has become common practice; however the impact on the intestinal microbiota has not been completely elucidated. In this study, neonatal piglets were randomized to: formula (FORM, n = 8), formula supplemented with 2 g/L each galactooligosaccharides (GOS) and polydextrose (PDX, F+GP, n = 9) or a sow-reared (SOW, n = 12) reference group for 19 days. The ileal (IL) and ascending colon (AC) microbiota were characterized using culture-dependent and -independent methods. 16S amplicon sequencing identified no differences at the genera level in the IL. Interestingly, six genera in the AC were significantly different between FORM and F+GP (P<0.05): Lactobacillus, Ruminococcus, Parabacteroides, Oscillospira, Hydrogenoanaerobacterium and Catabacter. In particular, the relative abundance of AC Lactobacillus was higher (P = 0.04) in F+GP as compared to FORM. Culture-dependent analysis of the IL and AC lactobacilli communities of FORM and F+GP revealed a Lactobacillus spp. composition similar to 16S amplicon sequencing. Additional analysis demonstrated individual Lactobacillus isolates were unable to ferment PDX. Conversely, a majority of lactobacilli isolates could ferment GOS, regardless of piglet diet. In addition, the ability of lactobacilli isolates to ferment the longer chain GOS fragments (DP 3 or greater), which are expected to be present in the distal intestine, was not different between FORM and F+GP. In conclusion, prebiotic supplementation of formula impacted the AC microbiota; however, direct utilization of GOS or PDX does not lead to an increase in Lactobacillus spp.

MATERIALES
Número de producto
Marca
Descripción del producto

Sigma-Aldrich
D-(+)-Glucosa, ≥99.5% (GC)
Sigma-Aldrich
D-(+)-Glucosa, powder, BioReagent, suitable for cell culture, suitable for insect cell culture, suitable for plant cell culture, ≥99.5%
Sigma-Aldrich
Alcohol etílico puro, 200 proof, anhydrous, ≥99.5%
Sigma-Aldrich
Ácido sulfúrico, 99.999%
Sigma-Aldrich
Dextrosa, 97.5-102.0% anhydrous basis, meets EP, BP, JP, USP testing specifications
Sigma-Aldrich
Alcohol etílico puro, 190 proof, ACS spectrophotometric grade, 95.0%
Sigma-Aldrich
D-(+)-Galactosa, ≥99% (HPLC), BioReagent, suitable for cell culture, suitable for insect cell culture
Sigma-Aldrich
D-(+)-Glucosa, ≥99.5% (GC), BioXtra
Sigma-Aldrich
D-(+)-Galactosa, ≥99% (HPLC)
Sigma-Aldrich
D-(+)-Glucosa, BioUltra, anhydrous, ≥99.5% (sum of enantiomers, HPLC)
Sigma-Aldrich
D-(+)-Glucosa, ACS reagent
Sigma-Aldrich
Alcohol etílico puro, 190 proof, meets USP testing specifications
Sigma-Aldrich
Ácido sulfúrico, SAJ first grade, ≥95.0%
Sigma-Aldrich
Ácido acético, suitable for luminescence, BioUltra, ≥99.5% (GC)
Sigma-Aldrich
Ácido sulfúrico, JIS special grade, ≥95.0%
Sigma-Aldrich
5α-Androstan-17β-ol-3-one, ≥97.5%
Sigma-Aldrich
D-(+)-Galactosa, ≥98% (HPLC)
Sigma-Aldrich
Ácido acético, ≥99.7%
Sigma-Aldrich
1-Propanol, ≥99%, FG
Sigma-Aldrich
Ácido acético, ≥99.5%, FCC, FG
Sigma-Aldrich
D-(+)-Glucosa, suitable for mouse embryo cell culture, ≥99.5% (GC)
Sigma-Aldrich
1-Propanol, anhydrous, 99.7%
Sigma-Aldrich
Ácido acético, natural, ≥99.5%, FG
Sigma-Aldrich
Ácido acético, JIS special grade, ≥99.7%
Supelco
Ethanol solution, 10 % (v/v) in H2O, analytical standard
Sigma-Aldrich
Ácido acético solution, 1 N, 1 M
Sigma-Aldrich
Sulfuric acid solution, 0.5 M
Sigma-Aldrich
Etanol, JIS special grade, 94.8-95.8%
Sigma-Aldrich
Ácido acético, SAJ first grade, ≥99.0%
Sigma-Aldrich
D-(+)-Glucosa, Hybri-Max, powder, BioReagent, suitable for hybridoma