Passa al contenuto
Merck
  • Mycophenolate mofetil vs. methotrexate for the prevention of graft-versus-host-disease--systematic review and meta-analysis.

Mycophenolate mofetil vs. methotrexate for the prevention of graft-versus-host-disease--systematic review and meta-analysis.

Leukemia research (2014-01-15)
Ron Ram, Moshe Yeshurun, Liat Vidal, Ofer Shpilberg, Anat Gafter-Gvili
ABSTRACT

We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of all trials comparing MMF and methotrexate as GVHD prophylaxis. Our search yielded 11 studies; 3 were randomized-control trials (RCTs). While the incidence of grades 2-4 acute GVHD was comparable, the incidence of grades 3 and 4 acute GVHD was higher in patients given MMF (RR 1.61; 95% CI 1.18-2.30). Incidence of mucositis was lower (RR 0.35; 95% CI 0.25-0.49) and time to engraftment was shorter (mean difference (-3.6); 95% CI -5.5 to -1.7) in patients given MMF. All other analyzed transplantation outcomes were comparable. We conclude that MMF, compared to methotrexate, is associated with increased severity of acute GVHD. Robustness of these results is hampered by the small number of RCTs.

MATERIALI
Numero di prodotto
Marchio
Descrizione del prodotto

Sigma-Aldrich
Metotrexato, ≥98% (HPLC), powder
Sigma-Aldrich
Metotrexato, powder, BioReagent, suitable for cell culture, ≥98% (HPLC)
Sigma-Aldrich
Metotrexato, meets USP testing specifications
Sigma-Aldrich
Mycophenolate mofetil, ≥98% (HPLC)
USP
Mycophenolate mofetil, United States Pharmacopeia (USP) Reference Standard
Sigma-Aldrich
Metotrexato, ≥99.0% (sum of enantiomers, HPLC)
Mycophenolate mofetil, European Pharmacopoeia (EP) Reference Standard
Mycophenolate mofetil for peak identification, European Pharmacopoeia (EP) Reference Standard