Skip to Content
MilliporeSigma
  • Resuscitation Outcomes Consortium-Amiodarone, Lidocaine or Placebo Study (ROC-ALPS): Rationale and methodology behind an out-of-hospital cardiac arrest antiarrhythmic drug trial.

Resuscitation Outcomes Consortium-Amiodarone, Lidocaine or Placebo Study (ROC-ALPS): Rationale and methodology behind an out-of-hospital cardiac arrest antiarrhythmic drug trial.

American heart journal (2014-04-29)
Peter J Kudenchuk, Siobhan P Brown, Mohamud Daya, Laurie J Morrison, Brian E Grunau, Tom Rea, Tom Aufderheide, Judy Powell, Brian Leroux, Christian Vaillancourt, Jonathan Larsen, Lynn Wittwer, M Riccardo Colella, Shannon W Stephens, Mark Gamber, Debra Egan, Paul Dorian
ABSTRACT

Despite their wide use, whether antiarrhythmic drugs improve survival after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) is not known. The ROC-ALPS is evaluating the effectiveness of these drugs for OHCA due to shock-refractory ventricular fibrillation or pulseless ventricular tachycardia (VF/VT). ALPS will randomize 3,000 adults across North America with nontraumatic OHCA, persistent or recurring VF/VT after ≥1 shock, and established vascular access to receive up to 450 mg amiodarone, 180 mg lidocaine, or placebo in the field using a double-blind protocol, along with standard resuscitation measures. The designated target population is all eligible randomized recipients of any dose of ALPS drug whose initial OHCA rhythm was VF/VT. A safety analysis includes all randomized patients regardless of their eligibility, initial arrhythmia, or actual receipt of ALPS drug. The primary outcome of ALPS is survival to hospital discharge; a secondary outcome is functional survival at discharge assessed as a modified Rankin Scale score ≤3. The principal aim of ALPS is to determine if survival is improved by amiodarone compared with placebo; secondary aim is to determine if survival is improved by lidocaine vs placebo and/or by amiodarone vs lidocaine. Prioritizing comparisons in this manner acknowledges where differences in outcome are most expected based on existing knowledge. Each aim also represents a clinically relevant comparison between treatments that is worth investigating. Results from ALPS will provide important information about the choice and value of antiarrhythmic therapies for VF/VT arrest with direct implications for resuscitation guidelines and clinical practice.

MATERIALS
Product Number
Brand
Product Description

Supelco
Lidocaine, Pharmaceutical Secondary Standard; Certified Reference Material
Sigma-Aldrich
Lidocaine, powder
Sigma-Aldrich
Lidocaine, analytical standard
Sigma-Aldrich
Lidocaine hydrochloride monohydrate, solid
Supelco
Lidocaine solution, 1.0 mg/mL in methanol, ampule of 1 mL, certified reference material, Cerilliant®
Lidocaine, European Pharmacopoeia (EP) Reference Standard
Lidocaine hydrochloride, European Pharmacopoeia (EP) Reference Standard
USP
Lidocaine, United States Pharmacopeia (USP) Reference Standard
Supelco
Lidocaine hydrochloride, Pharmaceutical Secondary Standard; Certified Reference Material