Skip to Content
MilliporeSigma
  • Development and comparison of two multi-residue methods for the analysis of select pesticides in honey bees, pollen, and wax by gas chromatography-quadrupole mass spectrometry.

Development and comparison of two multi-residue methods for the analysis of select pesticides in honey bees, pollen, and wax by gas chromatography-quadrupole mass spectrometry.

Talanta (2015-06-07)
Yuanbo Li, Rebecca A Kelley, Troy D Anderson, Michael J Lydy
ABSTRACT

One of the hypotheses that may help explain the loss of honey bee colonies worldwide is the increasing potential for exposure of honey bees to complex mixtures of pesticides. To better understand this phenomenon, two multi-residue methods based on different extraction and cleanup procedures have been developed, and compared for the determination of 11 relevant pesticides in honey bees, pollen, and wax by gas chromatography-quadrupole mass spectrometry. Sample preparatory methods included solvent extraction followed by gel permeation chromatography (GPC) cleanup and cleanup using a dispersive solid-phase extraction with zirconium-based sorbents (Z-Sep). Matrix effects, method detection limits, recoveries, and reproducibility were evaluated and compared. Method detection limits (MDL) of the pesticides for the GPC method in honey bees, pollen, and wax ranged from 0.65 to 5.92 ng/g dw, 0.56 to 6.61 ng/g dw, and 0.40 to 8.30 ng/g dw, respectively, while MDLs for the Z-Sep method were from 0.33 to 4.47 ng/g dw, 0.42 to 5.37 ng/g dw, and 0.51 to 5.34 ng/g dw, respectively. The mean recoveries in all matrices and at three spiking concentrations ranged from 64.4% to 149.5% and 71.9% to 126.2% for the GPC and Z-Sep methods, with relative standard deviation between 1.5-25.3% and 1.3-15.9%, respectively. The results showed that the Z-Sep method was more suitable for the determination of the target pesticides, especially chlorothalonil, in bee hive samples. The Z-Sep method was then validated using a series of field-collected bee hive samples taken from honey bee colonies in Virginia.

MATERIALS
Product Number
Brand
Product Description

Sigma-Aldrich
Acetic acid, ≥99.7%
Sigma-Aldrich
Acetone, suitable for residue analysis, ≥99.5%
Sigma-Aldrich
Acetone, JIS special grade, ≥99.5%
Sigma-Aldrich
Acetic acid, ≥99.7%, suitable for amino acid analysis
Sigma-Aldrich
Acetic acid, JIS special grade, ≥99.7%
Sigma-Aldrich
Acetone, ≥99.5%, suitable for residue analysis
Sigma-Aldrich
Acetic acid, SAJ first grade, ≥99.0%
Sigma-Aldrich
Acetic acid, ≥99.7%
Sigma-Aldrich
Acetone, SAJ first grade, ≥99.0%
Sigma-Aldrich
Acetic acid, 99.5-100.0%
Sigma-Aldrich
Acetic acid solution, 1 N, 1 M
Sigma-Aldrich
Acetic acid, ≥99.5%, FCC, FG
Sigma-Aldrich
Acetic acid, natural, ≥99.5%, FG
Sigma-Aldrich
Acetone, natural, ≥97%
Sigma-Aldrich
Acetone, ≥99%, FCC, FG
Sigma-Aldrich
Acetone, suitable for HPLC
Sigma-Aldrich
Acetone, suitable for residue analysis, JIS 5000
Sigma-Aldrich
Acetone, suitable for chromatography, ≥99.8%
Sigma-Aldrich
Acetic acid-12C2, 99.9 atom % 12C
Sigma-Aldrich
Acetone, suitable for HPLC, ≥99.9%
Sigma-Aldrich
Acetic acid, suitable for luminescence, BioUltra, ≥99.5% (GC)
Sigma-Aldrich
4,4′-Bis(N-carbazolyl)-1,1′-biphenyl, sublimed grade, 99.9% trace metals basis
Sigma-Aldrich
Hexane, JIS special grade, ≥96.0%
Sigma-Aldrich
Hexane, HPLC Plus, for HPLC, GC, and residue analysis, ≥95%
Sigma-Aldrich
Ethyl acetate, ≥99%, FCC, FG
Sigma-Aldrich
Ethyl acetate, natural, ≥99%, FCC, FG
Sigma-Aldrich
Hexane, suitable for HPLC
Supelco
Supel QuE, Z-Sep/C18 Tube, centrifuge tube volume 2 mL, pack of 100
Sigma-Aldrich
Poly(tetrafluoroethylene), powder, 200 μm particle size
Sigma-Aldrich
Poly(tetrafluoroethylene), powder (free-flowing), ≤12 μm particle size