HomeOrganic ElectronicsEfficient Dye-sensitized Solar Cells for Direct Conversion of Sunlight to Electricity

Efficient Dye-sensitized Solar Cells for Direct Conversion of Sunlight to Electricity

Kuppuswamy Kalyanasundaram, Michael Grätzel

Laboratory for Photonics and Interfaces (LPI), Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), CH-1015 Lausanne, Switzerland


Researchers have explored many processes where solar irradiation can be used to create an ecologically healthy environment. Examples range from energy storage to degradation of atomic waste, which is an attractive direct route for solar energy conversion and storage, with a high potential impact is the production of electricity. Advances in the synthesis of materials and experimental tools that permit manipulation or engineering at the molecular level have given impetus to the design of photonic and optoelectronic devices from a bottom-up type approach. One such device that our laboratory has been developing and optimizing for many years is a thin film solar cell that is based on dye-sensitization of wide bandgap semiconductors, in the form of nanocrystalline films. The design of the dye-sensitized solar cell (DSC) is detailed in Figure 1.

Schematic representation of a dye-sensitized thin layer solar cell.

Figure 1. Schematic representation of a dye-sensitized thin layer solar cell.

A dye-sensitized solar cell (DSC) is a sandwiched structure made of two conducting oxide electrodes with an organic redox electrolyte filling the interlayer separation (Figure 2). The heart of the solar cell is the mesoporous wide bangap oxide layer deposited onto a conducting oxide substrate. This oxide layer is composed of nano-sized particles that have been sintered together to enable electronic conduction. It has a spongy-like structure that upon immersion in a dye solution picks up the dye molecules giving an intense coloration. Exposure of the solar cell to visible light leads to electronic excitation of the dye, D, to an excited state form (D*) that can inject electrons to the conduction band of the oxide semiconductor. The original state of the dye D (D+) is subsequently restored by the reduction of the oxidized form of the dye by the redox electrolyte. In the most extensively studied version of DSC, the electrolyte is an iodide/triiodide mixture dissolved in an organic medium.

Exploded view of a dye-sensitized solar cell showing key components:

Figure 2. Exploded view of a dye-sensitized solar cell showing key components:

  1. transparent conducting oxide, TCO (working electrode, WE);
  2. underlayer (mesoporous oxide);
  3. photoactive mesoporous oxide with coated dye molecules;
  4. electrolyte containing redox mediators;
  5. sealing gasket/separator;
  6. finely divided Pt catalyst layer and
  7. transparent conducting oxide, TCO (counter-electrode, CE).

Electrons injected in the oxide layer hop through the network of the nano-sized particles to reach the back collector electrode. Under closed circuit conditions, the electrons flow over the external circuit to arrive at the counter electrode and reduce the oxidized form of the redox mediator. This sequence of reactions constitute a light-induced oxidation-reduction cycle or photosensitization of the semiconductor electrode. In the most extensively studied version, a polypyridine complex of Ru such as {Ru(4,4'-(COOH)2bpy)2(SCN)2} (N3, Product No. 703206) is used as the dye, together with an iodide/triiodide redox couple in methoxypropionitrile (Product No. 65290) solvent, which is used as the redox electrolyte. A variant of this system uses a hole transport material, a triarylamine deriviate, 2,2',7,7'-tetrakis-(N,N-dip-methoxyphenylamine)-9,9'-spirobithuorene, (spiro-OMeTAD), as an electron mediator instead of the (iodide-triiodide) mixture. The advantage of the spiro-OMeTAD based DSC version is that it is a solvent-free, quasi-solid state system that can be packaged for portable electronics.

Advantages of the Mesoporous Oxide Layers

Photosensitzation of semiconductors had been examined earlier1-8 with single crystal electrodes and the process was found to be relatively inefficient. Observed photocurrents were low (few μA/cm2), leading to an overall light conversion efficiency of <<1%. Several unique features of the DSC allow pronounced enhancement of the light energy efficiency. Using mesoporous structures, it is possible to control the dye distribution on the surface to achieve locally high concentrations without any side effects. The available surface area for dye distribution is considerably high in a mesoporous structure (surface roughness factor >1,000) and as such it is possible to achieve monolayer coverage without concentration quenching as observed on flat surfaces.1-8 It is also possible to have absorbance of >3 permitting near total absorption of visible light. However, increasing the surface area can lead to lower efficiencies due to the promotion of charge recombination before charges arrive at the collector electrode. Excited state charge injection of an anchored dye to the conduction band of the oxide semiconductor permits a design where the forward electron transfer can occur much faster compared to the backward electron movement, i.e., relaxation of the dye to its ground state. A five to six orders of magnitude difference is feasible permitting near quantitative scavenging of all injected electrons. In homogeneous solvents, back electron transfer tends to occur rapidly, often within the primary cage itself. In addition to the above differences due to the morphology of the dye-coated oxide substrate, there are other important effects that are responsible for the high overall efficiency of this type of solar cell. In contrast to the flat surfaces of macro-electrodes, a high concentration (typically 0.5 M) of iodide ions in the electrolyte effectively screens out any macroscopic electric fields. Charge separation is primarily driven by the inherent energetics (redox potentials) of the different species at the TiO2/dye/electrolyte interface rather than by the presence of macroscopic, electrostatic, potential energy gradients.

Progress and Challenges

The DSC research field can be an exciting playground for synthetic and materials scientists. Unlike single material-based crystalline semiconductor solar cells, DSCs have several key components which allow numerous innovative approaches. DSCs are being developed in many different textures and compositions, and display a variety of properties. In the following sections, we highlight some of the novel advancements being tested with a wide variety of chemical components. It has been possible to design DSC panels where the oxide layer is optically translucent to opaque; flexible, lightweight versions based on polymer supports in lieu of glass substrates (ideal for portable electronics) and also versions created in a variety of colors. Examination of numerous dyes of different chemical structure and functional groups has permitted identification of the key requirements for efficient sensitization:

  • Significant light absorption in the visible-near IR region to allow maximum harvesting of solar photons
  • Low-lying excited states formed in high quantum yield capable of participating in electron transfer processes
  • Position of the energy levels of the dye in the ground and excited states to permit efficient injection of charges from the excited states into the semiconductor conduction bound while also permitting quantitative regeneration of the dye by the redox mediators
  • Presence of suitable anchoring groups that promote efficient coupling of the dye excited state with the acceptor levels of the semiconducting oxide
  • Adequate chemical stability of the dye in its oxidized form to permit extensive redox cycling

Many dyes with a variety of chromophoric ligands have been synthesized and studied in DSCs: polypyridine complexes of transition metals, metalloporphyrins, and metallo-phathalocyanines as well as different metal-free, donor-acceptor type dyes. Figure 3 illustrates the tunability of colors in the design of DSCs.

Tuning of colors of dye-sensitized solar cell. Printed with permission from Schott AG.

Figure 3.Tuning of colors of dye-sensitized solar cell. Printed with permission from Schott AG.

Polypyridine complexes of Ru have been the first choice of dyes in most of the studies due to the vast knowledge accumulated over the years in regards to their photophysics and photoredox chemistry. Synthetically, it is easy to vary the level of conjugation of the polypyridine ligand systems and introduce suitable groups in the periphery of the ligands to induce and tune both spectral and redox properties. Coordination compounds of the general structure ML2X2, where L stands for 2, 2'-dicarboxybipyridine (dcbpy), M= Ru(II) or Os(II) and X represents a halide, cyanide, thiocyanate, acetyl acetonate, or thiocarbamate, and have been found to be efficient sensitizers. Ru-complexes based on carboxy bpy or carboxy terpy such as N3 (Product No. 703206), N719 (Product No. 703214), Z907 (Product No. 703168) and “black dye” (tris(cyanato)-2,2',2”-terpyridyl-4,4',4”-tricarboxylate)Ru(II) are used worldwide as benchmark reference dyes. Figure 4 shows the structures of some of these high performance dyes:

Structures of some of the most efficient Ru-dyes for dye solar cells.

Figure 4. Structures of some of the most efficient Ru-dyes for dye solar cells. (703206) (703214) (703168)

For coumarin or polyene-type organic dyes, strikingly high solar conversion efficiency reaching up to 9.2% has been reported by Arakawa, Uchida and coworkers.1-3 Molecular engineering of the interface is important to obtain high efficiencies. Additives that promote desegregation of the dye molecules and alkylamine donors help control the surface properties of the oxide. In addition to reducing the dark currents, they allow a higher fill factor.

State of the Art Performance

Solar cell research and development takes place at three levels. Primary optimization studies are done usually in small (<1 cm2 area) cells. Modules are the second phase of solar cell development and are larger in size (typically 25-100 cm2). The third stage involves large area terrestrial units for solar power generation which are much larger and composed of many modules connected in series or parallel. Typical panel sizes are 0.5 to 2 m2. Extensive research in many laboratories across the globe has led to significant progress in obtaining increasingly higher solar light conversion efficiencies, both at the lab cell levels and also in larger modules.

Tables 1 and 2 provide a summary of the best performance data obtained (state of the art) to date in solar light conversion, as well as open circuit voltages (VOC) at various fill factors (FF) using various dyes for a number of surface areas.

Table 1Record efficiencies of DSC of various device sizes.

N-719, N-749, and N-3 are codes for molecular structures as seen in Figure 4. All systems employ a liquid electrolyte mixture of (iodide/triiodide) in a low-viscosity solvent. Previously unpublished data.

Improvement in the light absorption properties of the dyes particularly in the near-IR region (700-900 nm) will lead to higher photocurrents and light conversion efficiency.

Table 2Efficiency of DSC lab-cells, sub-modules and modules obtained in recent years in different industrial laboratories in Japan. Previously unpublished data.

For practical applications, dye solar cells have to meet stringent stability requirements. For a lifespan of >10 years, the dyes have to be stable to reversibly undergo millions of oxidation and reduction cycles. In tropical countries, surface panel temperatures can easily exceed 60 °C. Hence, solar cell modules should be tested for stability at elevated temperatures up to 80 °C under high humidity conditions. With low boiling solvents, corrosion of the seal can also create stability problems. For this reason, current efforts are directed towards using low-temperature molten salts (ionic liquids) such as alkylimiadazolium halides. Using long-chain alkyl substituents on the bpy ligand as in the dye Z907 and ionic liquid based electrolytes, it is possible to maintain redox stability for over 1,000 hours of continuous illumination. Outdoor studies of modules have demonstrated several unique features of DSCs, such as higher solar energy conversion under diffuse light conditions and positive temperature coefficients. References listed below provide more detailed information about recent advances in the field of dye-sensitized solar cells.



Horiuchi T, Miura H, Sumioka K, Uchida S. 2004. High Efficiency of Dye-Sensitized Solar Cells Based on Metal-Free Indoline Dyes. J. Am. Chem. Soc.. 126(39):12218-12219.
Hara K, Sato T, Katoh R, Furube A, Yoshihara T, Murai M, Kurashige M, Ito S, Shinpo A, Suga S, et al. 2005. Novel Conjugated Organic Dyes for Efficient Dye-Sensitized Solar Cells. Adv. Funct. Mater.. 15(2):246-252.
Ito S, Zakeeruddin S, Humphry-Baker R, Liska P, Charvet R, Comte P, Nazeeruddin M, Péchy P, Takata M, Miura H, et al. 2006. High-Efficiency Organic-Dye- Sensitized Solar Cells Controlled by Nanocrystalline-TiO2 Electrode Thickness. Adv. Mater.. 18(9):1202-1205.
Zakeeruddin SM, Grätzel M. 2009. Solvent-Free Ionic Liquid Electrolytes for Mesoscopic Dye-Sensitized Solar Cells. Adv. Funct. Mater.. 19(14):2187-2202.
Mishra A, Fischer M, Bäuerle P. 2009. Metal-Free Organic Dyes for Dye-Sensitized Solar Cells: From Structure: Property Relationships to Design Rules. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.. 48(14):2474-2499.
Nazeeruddin MK, Grätzel M. 2007. Transition Metal Complexes for Photovoltaic and Light Emitting Applications.113-175.
Hagfeldt A, Graetzel M. 1995. Light-Induced Redox Reactions in Nanocrystalline Systems. Chem. Rev.. 95(1):49-68.
Kalyanasundaram K. 1998. Applications of functionalized transition metal complexes in photonic and optoelectronic devices. 177(1):347-414.
Hodes G. 2008. Comparison of Dye- and Semiconductor-Sensitized Porous Nanocrystalline Liquid Junction Solar Cells. J. Phys. Chem. C. 112(46):17778-17787.
Peter LM. 2007. Dye-sensitized nanocrystalline solar cells. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys.. 9(21):2630.
Peter LM. 2007. Characterization and Modeling of Dye-Sensitized Solar Cells. J. Phys. Chem. C. 111(18):6601-6612.
Bisquert J. Physical electrochemistry of nanostructured devices. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys.. 10(1):49-72.
Yum J, Chen P, Grätzel M, Nazeeruddin M. 2008. Recent Developments in Solid-State Dye-Sensitized Solar Cells. ChemSusChem. 1(8-9):699-707.
Gorlov M, Kloo L. 2008. Ionic liquid electrolytes for dye-sensitized solar cells. Dalton Trans..(20):2655.
Sign In To Continue

To continue reading please sign in or create an account.

Don't Have An Account?