Merck

Global conservation outcomes depend on marine protected areas with five key features.

Nature (2014-02-07)
Graham J Edgar, Rick D Stuart-Smith, Trevor J Willis, Stuart Kininmonth, Susan C Baker, Stuart Banks, Neville S Barrett, Mikel A Becerro, Anthony T F Bernard, Just Berkhout, Colin D Buxton, Stuart J Campbell, Antonia T Cooper, Marlene Davey, Sophie C Edgar, Günter Försterra, David E Galván, Alejo J Irigoyen, David J Kushner, Rodrigo Moura, P Ed Parnell, Nick T Shears, German Soler, Elisabeth M A Strain, Russell J Thomson
RESUMO

In line with global targets agreed under the Convention on Biological Diversity, the number of marine protected areas (MPAs) is increasing rapidly, yet socio-economic benefits generated by MPAs remain difficult to predict and under debate. MPAs often fail to reach their full potential as a consequence of factors such as illegal harvesting, regulations that legally allow detrimental harvesting, or emigration of animals outside boundaries because of continuous habitat or inadequate size of reserve. Here we show that the conservation benefits of 87 MPAs investigated worldwide increase exponentially with the accumulation of five key features: no take, well enforced, old (>10 years), large (>100 km(2)), and isolated by deep water or sand. Using effective MPAs with four or five key features as an unfished standard, comparisons of underwater survey data from effective MPAs with predictions based on survey data from fished coasts indicate that total fish biomass has declined about two-thirds from historical baselines as a result of fishing. Effective MPAs also had twice as many large (>250 mm total length) fish species per transect, five times more large fish biomass, and fourteen times more shark biomass than fished areas. Most (59%) of the MPAs studied had only one or two key features and were not ecologically distinguishable from fished sites. Our results show that global conservation targets based on area alone will not optimize protection of marine biodiversity. More emphasis is needed on better MPA design, durable management and compliance to ensure that MPAs achieve their desired conservation value.

MATERIAIS
Número do produto
Marca
Descrição do produto

Sigma-Aldrich
Silica, mesostructured, MSU-F (cellular foam)
Sigma-Aldrich
Silica
Sigma-Aldrich
LUDOX® TM-40 colloidal silica, 40 wt. % suspension in H2O
Sigma-Aldrich
LUDOX® LS colloidal silica, 30 wt. % suspension in H2O
Sigma-Aldrich
LUDOX® HS-30 colloidal silica, 30 wt. % suspension in H2O
Sigma-Aldrich
LUDOX® CL colloidal silica, 30 wt. % suspension in H2O
Sigma-Aldrich
Silica, nanopowder, spec. surface area 175-225 m2/g (BET), 99.8% trace metals basis
Sigma-Aldrich
LUDOX® SM colloidal silica, 30 wt. % suspension in H2O
Sigma-Aldrich
Silicon dioxide, alumina doped, nanoparticles, dispersion, <50 nm particle size, 20 wt. % in H2O, 99.99% trace metals basis
Sigma-Aldrich
Silica, mesostructured, MCM-41 type (hexagonal)
Sigma-Aldrich
Silicon dioxide, nanopowder, 10-20 nm particle size (BET), 99.5% trace metals basis
Sigma-Aldrich
Silicon dioxide, nanopowder (spherical, porous), 5-20 nm particle size (TEM), 99.5% trace metals basis
Sigma-Aldrich
Silica, nanoparticles, mesoporous, 200 nm particle size, pore size 4 nm
Sigma-Aldrich
LUDOX® HS-40 colloidal silica, 40 wt. % suspension in H2O
Sigma-Aldrich
LUDOX® TM-50 colloidal silica, 50 wt. % suspension in H2O
Sigma-Aldrich
LUDOX® AS-40 colloidal silica, 40 wt. % suspension in H2O
Sigma-Aldrich
LUDOX® AS-30 colloidal silica, 30 wt. % suspension in H2O
Sigma-Aldrich
LUDOX® TMA colloidal silica, 34 wt. % suspension in H2O
Sigma-Aldrich
LUDOX® CL-X colloidal silica, 45 wt. % suspension in H2O
Sigma-Aldrich
LUDOX® AM colloidal silica, 30 wt. % suspension in H2O